It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 9:35 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
Post subject: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:34 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:43 pm
Posts: 523
Location: Oakland Tennessee
My new 2011 strat has a rosewood fingerboard and my older 2010 model has a maple fingerboard with polyurethane on it.They both have the standard medium jumbo frets that come on Am Standard strats. The rosewwood frets are just a little taller(all of the fret is exposed) because the fretboard doesn't have the thick coat of urethane on it. It seems for me its a little easier to play than the maple neck. Also the string height is set a little higher on my new one and I think this helps too. I've learned that for me, low action isn't better or easier. I gotta raise the action on my 2010 now and see how I like it. Does any of this make sense to anyone.

_________________
"Damn Right I Got the Blues"


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:52 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 25
yes. i feel a little fast in maple...but RW rule´s :headbang: jaja

_________________
Image


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 2:43 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:44 am
Posts: 67
Location: Houston, TX
I find it hard to dig into if the action isn't set a little higher than stock. I personally just got a maple neck MIA and love it. It plays like butter vs my rosewood strat. Sometimes on the rosewood, I can literally dig the strings into the wood. Not so much on the maple neck.

_________________
"If it ain't one thing, it's another."


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:44 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:57 am
Posts: 13164
Location: Peckham: where the snow leopards roam
bshane84 wrote:
It seems for me its a little easier to play than the maple neck.

Hi bshane84: ignoring all the silly shouting that goes on regarding the rosewood-maple thing, it seems to me what you've just said is a sensible reason to prefer one to another. If you like the feel of one or the other you need no further justification to make your choice. Way to go.


bshane84 wrote:
Also the string height is set a little higher on my new one and I think this helps too. I've learned that for me, low action isn't better or easier. I gotta raise the action on my 2010 now and see how I like it. Does any of this make sense to anyone.

It makes perfect sense to me. Lotta people want the lowest action they can get, and that's fine. But personally I like mine set pretty much to Fender spec, which I guess is average, and there's nothing wrong with higher still. It makes your fingers work harder and so your fretting could end up being more positive, which might be no bad thing.

Action is entirely a case of strokes for folks. Don't let anyone else's preference divert you from your own.

Cheers - C

_________________
Image


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:24 pm
Offline
Amateur
Amateur
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:50 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Bitterroot Valley, MT
bshane84 wrote:
I've learned that for me, low action isn't better or easier. I gotta raise the action on my 2010 now and see how I like it.

What feels best for you probably is...

There's no one-size-fits-all solution in guitars... Strats, Teles, LPs, there's something for every taste, hand size, and preference.


bshane84 wrote:
Does any of this make sense to anyone.

If you like the action a little higher and aren't bending strings out of tune it's ALL GOOD<G>

My Tele and the 335 are set up completely differently, but they both fit me wonderfully!

_________________
Still looking for that One Guitar To Rule Them All since 1964...
FSR Fender 60 Anniversary Strat HSS MIM, Gibson ES 335, Taylor 555, Ovation Custom Balladeer-12, Baby Taylor, Fender Princeton Chorus (stereo), Fender Champ 600


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:55 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:43 pm
Posts: 523
Location: Oakland Tennessee
I've been playing with my action too low which is why I can't grab holt of the strings. It's alot easier with the action set higher . Hammer ons, pull offs, bends, even chording is easier with my action set higher. I mean, its not super high, it's just around what Fender recommends. It's really nice. Thanks for the comments guys.

_________________
"Damn Right I Got the Blues"


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:38 pm
Offline
Amateur
Amateur
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:01 am
Posts: 183
Location: Riverwest
I guess I've always liked rosewood better. I like maple - when the finish is worn off and it mellows out a bit. I always think of shiny new maple fretboards as being good for that whole sparse Prince-esque splanky funk sound, where the notes just really "pop". Other than that, it's just a bit bright for my taste. Although throw huge-enough frets on like a lot of new guitars and I really don't think it makes that much of a difference.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:22 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:53 am
Posts: 5189
Location: Magnolia, Texas (just north of Houston)
Maple vs Rosewood...String Height...Guage of Strings...all this is a personal choice for the guitarist playing that guitar. There is no absolute right or wrong, just what feels good to you. Keep Rocking!

For me I prefer rosewood finger boards, string height to be as low as possible without buzzing (and this does vary on my guitars), and I play 10-46 pure nickel strings on all my guitars. This has worked for me for many years. With this set up I feel I get a mellow tone.

_________________
RK

2007 Fender Highway 1
2012 American Deluxe
2015 MIM Dave Murray HHH
2010 Fender Blacktop
1987 Fender Avalon Acoustic
2012 Marshall DSL 15 watt head


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:43 am
Offline
Roadie
Roadie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:44 pm
Posts: 236
Location: Winnipeg, MB
For me, the only reason to select rosewood or maple is the colour/type of the guitar. Strats should be maple, 335s should be rosewood. Beyond that, once I'm playing, I really don't care. The only wood I have a real preference for is ebony, which is uncommon, anyways.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:12 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 1
prolog wrote:
For me, the only reason to select rosewood or maple is the colour/type of the guitar. Strats should be maple, 335s should be rosewood. Beyond that, once I'm playing, I really don't care. The only wood I have a real preference for is ebony, which is uncommon, anyways.


Absolutely right - I was thinking two years of getting a Standard Strat in Lake Placid blue with rosewood - and then I chose the maple neck - and it looks great on the guitar. I cannot feel much difference to any rosewood neck, but this is personal preference and everyone should get the neck they prefer. My sunburst Squier e.g. looks amazing with rosewood...


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: An Observation on Maple and Rosewood. Comments Welcome.
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:41 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 12:45 pm
Posts: 1169
bshane84 wrote:
... The rosewwood frets are just a little taller(all of the fret is exposed) because the fretboard doesn't have the thick coat of urethane on it. ...


Sounds like fret replacement on a maple neck could be a lot more painful than on the rosewood.

_________________
In my opinion Leo Fender had essentially perfected the guitar amplifier by 1964.


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: