It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 11:29 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:33 pm
Offline
Roadie
Roadie
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:52 pm
Posts: 255
FirstMeasure wrote:
Technique aside, Clapton was a member of two of the most influential bands of the 60's (Yardbirds and Bluesbreakers), co-founded the most influential band to come out of England in the 60's (Cream), collaborated with some Big Guns for a brief but incredibly Influential projects (Derek & the Dominoes, Blind Faith), collaborated with some lesser known talent because he wanted to (Bonnie and Delaney), then started into the most successful and influential solo career in the history of Rock and Roll (40+ years of Artistic and Commercial milestones), now he's keeping the flame lit with his Star Studded Crossroads festivals and constant touring. And, of course, his career is studded with guest appearances with the best of the best (Beatles, B.B. King, Phil Collins, et. al.)

Kath was Chicago's guitar player. One format, one style of music and a hand full of well received songs, mostly based on Horns, Vocals and Big Band arrangement.


Hmm... Quite a contest :roll: :lol:

Kath and Sly Stone would be a better comparison.


how do you compare a guitar player to a keyboard player?


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:14 am
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:31 pm
Posts: 2122
Location: Southern California Mountains
cookieman15061 wrote:
FirstMeasure wrote:
Technique aside, Clapton was a member of two of the most influential bands of the 60's (Yardbirds and Bluesbreakers), co-founded the most influential band to come out of England in the 60's (Cream), collaborated with some Big Guns for a brief but incredibly Influential projects (Derek & the Dominoes, Blind Faith), collaborated with some lesser known talent because he wanted to (Bonnie and Delaney), then started into the most successful and influential solo career in the history of Rock and Roll (40+ years of Artistic and Commercial milestones), now he's keeping the flame lit with his Star Studded Crossroads festivals and constant touring. And, of course, his career is studded with guest appearances with the best of the best (Beatles, B.B. King, Phil Collins, et. al.)

Kath was Chicago's guitar player. One format, one style of music and a hand full of well received songs, mostly based on Horns, Vocals and Big Band arrangement.


Hmm... Quite a contest :roll: :lol:

Kath and Sly Stone would be a better comparison.


how do you compare a guitar player to a keyboard player?

Image
Image
"Multi-instrumentalist"

And he's a darn good lead player, too.

_________________
"Persistence Is The Father Of Invention"
-Crazy Old Man In Training
Image


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 9:52 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3448
Location: Connecticut
This entire thread on " Who is Best " is an old worn out, pointless argument.
Akin to asking the same question about M.C. Esher vs. Salvador Dali.

Seriously, Clapton is Clapton, Kath was Kath, all the other's are who they are.
I fail to understand the need for juxtaposition of musicians to quantify them in a personal subjective criteria which is baseless to anyone else.

Enjoy their musical contribution or don't..
But enough of trying to make it a horse race..... :roll:

_________________
"C'est parti mon Kiki "


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:31 pm
Posts: 2122
Location: Southern California Mountains
53magnatone wrote:
This entire thread on " Who is Best " is an old worn out, pointless argument.
Akin to asking the same question about M.C. Esher vs. Salvador Dali.

Seriously, Clapton is Clapton, Kath was Kath, all the other's are who they are.
I fail to understand the need for juxtaposition of musicians to quantify them in a personal subjective criteria which is baseless to anyone else.

Enjoy their musical contribution or don't..
But enough of trying to make it a horse race..... :roll:

Where could this attitude and perception come from? Any one care to guess who would take a beautiful gift like music and turn it into a Roller Derby? Who would want to take all the happy little music fans and turn them into harpies, biting at the necks of one another instead of dancing and singing in blissful harmony....who could it be...hmmm..could it be........SATAN?
Image

or just the Billboard charts?
http://www.billboard.com/charts/#/charts/

It's the nature of the industry, they only market the "Best" (as decided by quarterly sales), so the audience naturally feeds off that scene and competes for "Best" as well. Just the competitive nature of the business that is, ironically, marketing art based on cooperation.

_________________
"Persistence Is The Father Of Invention"
-Crazy Old Man In Training
Image


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:24 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3448
Location: Connecticut
Yeah...One of the many reasons why iv'e never bought or subscribed to Billboard.
I have always liked certain bands because of what I heard, not what some so called critic ranks as top of the pops or whatever.

I appreciated Duran Duran just as much as Rammstein and just as much as Alexis Korner or Malmsteen.

So excuse me but i'll now return to listening to Anne Sophie Mutter.... :wink:

_________________
"C'est parti mon Kiki "


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:01 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:10 pm
Posts: 5646
Location: Gateway to the West
You have got to be kidding me, 64 posts on this one? Oh excuse me 65 now.

The fact that there were some on this forum that didn't know who Kath was says it all.

However, can we let this one die...no one is going to win this contest!

T2

_________________
-----------------------------------------------------------
What time is it? It's Fender Time.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 9:52 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3448
Location: Connecticut
T2Stratman wrote:
You have got to be kidding me, 64 posts on this one? Oh excuse me 65 now.

The fact that there were some on this forum that didn't know who Kath was says it all.

However, can we let this one die...no one is going to win this contest!

T2


+100

_________________
"C'est parti mon Kiki "


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:13 am
Offline
Amateur
Amateur

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 153
FirstMeasure wrote:
Where could this attitude and perception come from? Any one care to guess who would take a beautiful gift like music and turn it into a Roller Derby? Who would want to take all the happy little music fans and turn them into harpies, biting at the necks of one another instead of dancing and singing in blissful harmony....who could it be...hmmm..could it be........SATAN?
Image


:lol: That's dang ol' funny right there. Seriously dude, Clapton's had a biography out for a few years now. Go pick it up and you'll find that the most competitive action Clapton had with another musician was vying for the affection of George Harrison's wife.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:00 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:04 pm
Posts: 7056
Location: South Florida
I choose Clapton because I like his style better.

I too am surprised at how many people don't know who Kath was. A friend of mine back in the day played trumpet and guitar so he was naturally drawn to Chicago and Kath. Kath had some great solos, but I'll always remember him for that awful "Free Form Guitar" on the first album (Strat thru a Dual Showman if I remember correctly).

BTW - Kath killed himself accidentally. He was not looking to off himself.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re:
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:48 am
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:07 pm
Posts: 8
63supro wrote:
Kath committed suicide a long time ago. You can hear Kath on 25 Or 6 To 4 by Chicago. Two very different players.

One of the greatest guitar solos ever on 25 or 6 to 4!!!
Especially the exstended version with the wah wah part that they don't play on the radio that often.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 2:13 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:31 pm
Posts: 2122
Location: Southern California Mountains
candycoke09 wrote:

:lol: That's dang ol' funny right there. Seriously dude, Clapton's had a biography out for a few years now. Go pick it up and you'll find that the most competitive action Clapton had with another musician was vying for the affection of George Harrison's wife.


LOL. We'll call her Layla.

That's true, Clapton isn't a very competitive person, but the musician usually isn't the competitive one. It's fans, teachers, producers, managers, and the like.

Go to an audition, you're competing.

Try to get your cover band in a bar, you're competing with every other band that left that bar a press package.

Try to get your original band on the bill, you competing for the best slot.

Join the High School band, your competing for the best parts (if you don't compete, you fall behind or fail).

Get your material released, your competing for air space.

The only place in music with any cooperation is within the band, or after you've made it to the top.

On a side note, Clapton might not have been very cometitive, but there were more than a few acts competing for him when he joined Mayall and even more when he joined Cream. And I bet the Hollywood Bowl would love to get him back since Staples Center (aka "The Competition") stole him away.

It's only natural that the competitive spirit spills into the audience.

_________________
"Persistence Is The Father Of Invention"
-Crazy Old Man In Training
Image


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 4:28 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 4:11 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Clapton is.

_________________
BOSS ST-2 POWER STACK
BOSS ML-2 METAL CORE
BOSS MT-2 METAL ZONE
BOSS MD-2 MEGA DISTORTION
BOSS DS-2 TURBO DISTORTION
BOSS DS-1 DISTORTION
BOSS OS-2 OVERDRIVE/DISTORTION
BOSS OD-3 OVERDRIVE
BOSS SD-1 SUPER OVERDRIVE
VOX TONELAB ST


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:51 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:46 pm
Posts: 2041
Well, I finally read this topic end to end and I finally know who Kath was. I'm 62, never cared for Chicago back in the 60s when I was learning guitar, don't have any Chicago CDs in my massive (and very competitive) 3,400 CD collection; though I do have Chicago's Greatest Hits 1 & 2 in my computer library of 45,000+ songs.

I've been playing guitar since 1963, but have never considered myself to be a competitive player. I have always tried to become a better player and I have incorporated licks from other guitar players into my playing, but wouldn't consider that being competitive on my part, just learning and growing.

I have accumulated a LOT of guitars since my first Silvertone in 1963 and I have acquired a LOT of different amps, but I've never considered it to be because I was competing with anyone, mostly just considered it a form of mental illness on my part, an opinion with which my wife would heartily agree.

Clapton is a good guitar player and I've learned a number of his solos, but I'd never use those solos to compete with anyone else.

_________________
Dennis in CR
Rockin' since 1963


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Who Is Better??? Clapton or Kath
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:20 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3448
Location: Connecticut
If one reads the definition of competition in a dictionary or for those who have forgotten how to manually turn a book page :lol: Wikipedia....
The very definition strikes a rather negative result when competition is used in the musical context.
We all more or less agree that music is an art form, therefore it is subject to individual interpretation which in and of itself is subjective ( sorry about the redundancy :wink: )
Paradoxically the nature or I should say... the inherent theme in Competition is the actual result of the supremacy of one, over another.
IMHO this is not a productive trait when applied to an art form.
the resulting finality is that there is a winner and a loser, granted it is not to the death per se, but it still means that someone is terminated, be it literally or figuratively, the result is the same. Resentment, revenge, humiliation all come to the fore.
Hardly a mindset to base creativity upon.

Instead of Competition, a more objective set of parameters based on an individual's musical interpretation's would be a much more pleasant outcome.
In retrospect this explains why I have never attended or been a part of a battle of the bands scenario, one of which I have always deemed to be ludicrous.

Bear in mind, dissenting opinions are still welcome to bring their Katana's to the Joust.. :P

_________________
"C'est parti mon Kiki "


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: