It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 9:44 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next
Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next
Author Message
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 2:40 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:56 pm
Posts: 3941
Location: Great White North, EH!
orvilleowner wrote:
nikininja wrote:
O.O. Any chance of a link?

Notice the 3piece body too. So 1 piece isnt vintage correct.


Ha! Good dig on the one-piece body thing! Anyway, one-piece bodies were never the standard, I just think there were more of them back in 1954-ish.

The site with the info & pictures of that prototype Strat body is
http://soundlogic-usa.com/electron/FDP/fdp229a.html

Check out a thread at the FDP (Fender Discussion Pages) where JMPRO (=53 strat) first came forward with this guitar/story. I don't want to try to put a link to another forum on this forum.

The story appeared in an issue of Vintage Guitar magazine too. I know that I had MANY questions after learning some of the story of this prototype Strat body and how it made it into 53 strat's family. It is real, people.
I'm not actually really doubting it. I am curious on how you would go about authenticating it though.

_________________
I'm not an expert, but I play one on the internet.

Image


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 2:51 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:27 pm
Posts: 1242
Location: Grass Valley, CA
cvilleira wrote:
strato wrote:
Boy, don't you guys watch CSI? :wink: The grain pattern of any piece of wood is as individual as a fingerprint, and could not be accurately reproduced, especially on the scale of this guitar body. Assuming the photos of the original prototype are authentic (and I don't think anyone is arguing that point), I would think it would be a pretty easy task to do a photo overlay of 53 strat's strat and the old photos.

So what are you saying like Photoshop creation of a photos for post?
Which would account on being able to match bodies because yes its true no two grains are alike as we all no.

Huh? What I am suggesting is that if someone wanted to authenticate 53 strat's guitar, and the original photos are, in fact authentic, it would would be relatively easy to do using photo overlays.

_________________
“All music is folk music, I ain't never heard no horse sing a song.” Louis Armstrong


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 2:55 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:33 pm
Posts: 68
So much of the story of this old Strat has been told so many times on the net and in Vintage Guitar magazine I forget there are lots of people that don't know the story. Non of the history of this guitar has ever been hidden or slanted. It is what it is. It was a prototype when it was built. They probably tried lots of different parts on it as it progressed through testing and we only have the photo record that leo took that day and what it looked like that day to refer to. In another picuture of it it shows a black guard with white knobs. When my dad got it 54 it had a white guard and white knobs with white pup covers. The guitar didn't have a Fender logo on it in Leos old pics and didn't have the logo when my dad got it. In Richards book he said that decals weren't even listed on the end of year 53 inventory sheets.
The Fender custom shop had the guitar for a few days in 07 and most of the guys there had a look at it and all agreed it was the same guitar that was pictured in the book. The original pictures Leo took are still in his old fileing caninate at G&L guitars. If you know someone over there you could probably get to see them. I have had no success in that endevor.

The guitar was considered a cast off from the factory for many years and was treated as such. The neck was changed to another guitar and later sold. When parts wore out they were replaced . The pup covers, knobs and pots have been replaced. Two of the pups have been replaced and the body has been finished and sanded 2 times but somehow I see all this as something Leo would have done if he had kept working on it. Many times it has been written Leo was never satisfied with some of his guitars even as they went into production.
The guitar is a bastard now and was when Leo built. Some say its a holy grail and some say its really neat old body and bridge with some old and some not so old parts. I have no great expectations as to what its worth. If I get a big check for it {and by the way, that comes with a 1099 for tax collections purposes} fine, If I don't thats fine to. I have been in possesion of it for over 50 years and could keep another 20 or so with no problem.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 2:55 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:34 am
Posts: 93
Martian wrote:
I'd tell everyone who is a big collector with the big money to support it. These are the only ones whom I'd want to know. Pitted against each other, eventually one would buy it from me for a ridiculous sum of money and then, I'd take that money and buy lots of, "non famous", superior specimen Stratocasters and appliance upgrades to go with them. If I have any money left over, I might even pay some bills too!


My sentiments exactly, except I would throw a little travel in there as well.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 3:13 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:56 pm
Posts: 3941
Location: Great White North, EH!
53 strat wrote:
So much of the story of this old Strat has been told so many times on the net and in Vintage Guitar magazine I forget there are lots of people that don't know the story. Non of the history of this guitar has ever been hidden or slanted. It is what it is. It was a prototype when it was built. They probably tried lots of different parts on it as it progressed through testing and we only have the photo record that leo took that day and what it looked like that day to refer to. In another picuture of it it shows a black guard with white knobs. When my dad got it 54 it had a white guard and white knobs with white pup covers. The guitar didn't have a Fender logo on it in Leos old pics and didn't have the logo when my dad got it. In Richards book he said that decals weren't even listed on the end of year 53 inventory sheets.
The Fender custom shop had the guitar for a few days in 07 and most of the guys there had a look at it and all agreed it was the same guitar that was pictured in the book. The original pictures Leo took are still in his old fileing caninate at G&L guitars. If you know someone over there you could probably get to see them. I have had no success in that endevor.

The guitar was considered a cast off from the factory for many years and was treated as such. The neck was changed to another guitar and later sold. When parts wore out they were replaced . The pup covers, knobs and pots have been replaced. Two of the pups have been replaced and the body has been finished and sanded 2 times but somehow I see all this as something Leo would have done if he had kept working on it. Many times it has been written Leo was never satisfied with some of his guitars even as they went into production.
The guitar is a bastard now and was when Leo built. Some say its a holy grail and some say its really neat old body and bridge with some old and some not so old parts. I have no great expectations as to what its worth. If I get a big check for it {and by the way, that comes with a 1099 for tax collections purposes} fine, If I don't thats fine to. I have been in possesion of it for over 50 years and could keep another 20 or so with no problem.
Very cool. i am a bit surprised that G&L won't set up access to those photos. I understand their wanting to be careful with them, but they could set it up, with their key people to oversee it. I mean, a company with such strong ties to Leo, and no one is curious enough to make a comparison?(This isn't to cast doubt on your story, but if i were them, I'd do it, just to get a good look at your guitar.)

_________________
I'm not an expert, but I play one on the internet.

Image


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 3:20 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Posts: 7714
Location: Planet Earth
53 strat wrote:
So much of the story of this old Strat has been told so many times on the net and in Vintage Guitar magazine I forget there are lots of people that don't know the story. Non of the history of this guitar has ever been hidden or slanted. It is what it is. It was a prototype when it was built. They probably tried lots of different parts on it as it progressed through testing and we only have the photo record that leo took that day and what it looked like that day to refer to. In another picuture of it it shows a black guard with white knobs. When my dad got it 54 it had a white guard and white knobs with white pup covers. The guitar didn't have a Fender logo on it in Leos old pics and didn't have the logo when my dad got it. In Richards book he said that decals weren't even listed on the end of year 53 inventory sheets.
The Fender custom shop had the guitar for a few days in 07 and most of the guys there had a look at it and all agreed it was the same guitar that was pictured in the book. The original pictures Leo took are still in his old fileing caninate at G&L guitars. If you know someone over there you could probably get to see them. I have had no success in that endevor.

The guitar was considered a cast off from the factory for many years and was treated as such. The neck was changed to another guitar and later sold. When parts wore out they were replaced . The pup covers, knobs and pots have been replaced. Two of the pups have been replaced and the body has been finished and sanded 2 times but somehow I see all this as something Leo would have done if he had kept working on it. Many times it has been written Leo was never satisfied with some of his guitars even as they went into production.
The guitar is a bastard now and was when Leo built. Some say its a holy grail and some say its really neat old body and bridge with some old and some not so old parts. I have no great expectations as to what its worth. If I get a big check for it {and by the way, that comes with a 1099 for tax collections purposes} fine, If I don't thats fine to. I have been in possesion of it for over 50 years and could keep another 20 or so with no problem.


Thats pretty cool then I must say. How did your Dad aquire it back in 1954?

_________________
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

Thomas Jefferson


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 3:42 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
I think i'm with the 'strat of all strats' or 'daddy strat' camp.

Way cool guitar. Way way way cool. Just think its entirely likely that all of our strats were designed on that body amongst others.

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 3:59 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:44 am
Posts: 7282
Location: Washington
nikininja wrote:
Way cool guitar. Way way way cool. Just think its entirely likely that all of our strats were designed on that body amongst others.


Yes, very cool.

I'd like to see the bodies that came before it. There are no pictures or remaining parts of the first tremolo system that Leo designed for the Strat. Supposedly, it was more along the lines of the Jazzmaster tremolo. Fender had trouble getting it work and sound right, so it was junked in favor of what became the Strat's tremolo system.

_________________
Member #26797
My other guitar is a Strat.

Image


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 4:15 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
Could you imagine those first tremolo's? I thought they were bigsby derivatives. Imagine being privy to the design process, seeing genius in action.

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 4:50 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:33 pm
Posts: 68
cvilleira wrote:
53 strat wrote:
So much of the story of this old Strat has been told so many times on the net and in Vintage Guitar magazine I forget there are lots of people that don't know the story. Non of the history of this guitar has ever been hidden or slanted. It is what it is. It was a prototype when it was built. They probably tried lots of different parts on it as it progressed through testing and we only have the photo record that leo took that day and what it looked like that day to refer to. In another picuture of it it shows a black guard with white knobs. When my dad got it 54 it had a white guard and white knobs with white pup covers. The guitar didn't have a Fender logo on it in Leos old pics and didn't have the logo when my dad got it. In Richards book he said that decals weren't even listed on the end of year 53 inventory sheets.
The Fender custom shop had the guitar for a few days in 07 and most of the guys there had a look at it and all agreed it was the same guitar that was pictured in the book. The original pictures Leo took are still in his old fileing caninate at G&L guitars. If you know someone over there you could probably get to see them. I have had no success in that endevor.

The guitar was considered a cast off from the factory for many years and was treated as such. The neck was changed to another guitar and later sold. When parts wore out they were replaced . The pup covers, knobs and pots have been replaced. Two of the pups have been replaced and the body has been finished and sanded 2 times but somehow I see all this as something Leo would have done if he had kept working on it. Many times it has been written Leo was never satisfied with some of his guitars even as they went into production.
The guitar is a bastard now and was when Leo built. Some say its a holy grail and some say its really neat old body and bridge with some old and some not so old parts. I have no great expectations as to what its worth. If I get a big check for it {and by the way, that comes with a 1099 for tax collections purposes} fine, If I don't thats fine to. I have been in possesion of it for over 50 years and could keep another 20 or so with no problem.


Thats pretty cool then I must say. How did your Dad aquire it back in 1954?




Thanks to you all for all your kind support. The guitar was given to my father by a friend of his that worked at Fender. The story was that he got it to do some field testing but he got it in 54 and the design had been changed and production had already started so I can't imagine what he was testing., maybe pickups?


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 4:59 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Posts: 7714
Location: Planet Earth
Did your Dad pass the name of the Fender employee on to you and was he paid for doing testing? It facinating tracking the historic Providence of these thing.

_________________
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

Thomas Jefferson


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:02 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:11 am
Posts: 83
I saw a 72 lefty strat with 3 original 1968 pickups staggered right handedly, and bigsby bridge for sale on ebay today for $2,300.

Boy it looked like an 18 wheeler.

_________________
One of God's own prototypes. Too weird to live, too rare to die.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:10 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:33 pm
Posts: 68
cvilleira wrote:
Did your Dad pass the name of the Fender employee on to you and was he paid for doing testing? It facinating tracking the historic Providence of these thing.


I watched as my dad and his friend {he perfers to remain nameless but is one of the only ones left from that time} assembled the guitar on our kitchen table from a box of parts.They heated up an old time soldering iron on the kitchen stove and put all the wireing together. When it was strung up, him and my dad had a little jam. Wildwood Rose as I remember.
Back then nobody got paid for endorsements or testing, they were just happy to get to play the guitar and maybe keep it.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:17 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:27 pm
Posts: 1242
Location: Grass Valley, CA
I know this discussion is really getting away from the original topic, but I love these historic musings. Anyway, here is one of Leo's patents, this one for a tremolo device filed in August 1954.

Image

_________________
“All music is folk music, I ain't never heard no horse sing a song.” Louis Armstrong


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:28 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:11 am
Posts: 83
I'm going to change this topic title to Rare Strats, it'll fit more. Hehe.

_________________
One of God's own prototypes. Too weird to live, too rare to die.


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next
Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eracer_Team and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: