It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 9:03 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 12:08 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:57 am
Posts: 13164
Location: Peckham: where the snow leopards roam
On the thing about vibration changing the tone of a solid body guitar, I make no comment one way or another on this (way above my paygrade). But Yamaha have introduced a treatment pioneered on their top end violins and now extended to their (expensive) SG2000 electrics which they call Initial Response Acceleration.

What I recall from a magazine article (which I am too lazy to look out right now) is that various frequencies of sound are directed through the finished guitar and monitored in some way to measure a response. This gives numbers which are the "frequency signature" of that individual guitar.

The guitar is then strapped to a machine which is set to vibrate hard at those particular frequencies for a period: 20 - 30 minutes; something like that. The idea is that at the end of that the wood has somehow been realined at a cellular level, and Yamaha claim that the tone is improved to an extent that players can detect.

I recall that the magazine article said the treatment was comparable to having the guitar ride around in the trunk of a car on bumpy roads for a year or so.

Yamaha themselves are pretty skimpy on info. This sounds the kind of nonsense I heard from an osteopath one time, before he proceeded to wreck my back for me:

http://uk.yamaha.com/en/products/musica ... e=features

I presume something along these lines was what Matthias Jabs was hoping to achieve (above).

I have no view on all this - but I bet I can guess what dgonz will make of it...!! :wink:

Cheers - C


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 12:14 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:44 am
Posts: 7282
Location: Washington
Ceri wrote:
What I recall from a magazine article (which I am too lazy to look out right now) is that various frequencies of sound are directed through the finished guitar and monitored in some way to measure a response. This gives numbers which are the "frequency signature" of that individual guitar.

The guitar is then strapped to a machine which is set to vibrate hard at those particular frequencies for a period: 20 - 30 minutes; something like that. The idea is that at the end of that the wood has somehow been realined at a cellular level, and Yamaha claim that the tone is improved to an extent that players can detect.


Being a numbers guy, you can guess what my response is. If they've got "numbers," then one should be able to compare them before and after the shaking treatment.
-----------------
BTW, I have Googled (it's my friend, you know) some of your work and I would say that you have had some success! I didn't want to jump into the tail-end of that other crazy thread to add this comment. I try hard to avoid the trolls and troll-like behaviour.

_________________
Member #26797
My other guitar is a Strat.

Image


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 12:24 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:57 am
Posts: 13164
Location: Peckham: where the snow leopards roam
orvilleowner wrote:
Being a numbers guy, you can guess what my response is. If they've got "numbers," then one should be able to compare them before and after the shaking treatment.
-----------------
BTW, I have Googled (it's my friend, you know) some of your work and I would say that you have had some success! I didn't want to jump into the tail-end of that other crazy thread to add this comment. I try hard to avoid the trolls and troll-like behaviour.


(Yes, I've tried to avoid those situations too. But all is well and friendly now, I'm very glad to say.)

Haha - thank you! Assuming you found the right one, that is. Problematically, there seems to be a young blonde female model around at present with exactly the same name, and with whom I seem to have been mistaken at least once, to much bewilderment... :lol:

As to the shaken guitar thing: the article I read was in a review of the SG2000 in Guitarist. I believe the description of the process was given in a tone of studiously suspended judgement...

Cheers - C


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 1:05 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 12:56 pm
Posts: 7
FWIW - a rather seasoned Fender Gold Tech who does some stellar work for a handful of known players had something to say on this topic. He was confident that sympathetic vibrations helped to keep the copper in the pickups from going to a brittle state, thereby mellowing their tone over time. His advice was to leave the guitar near a good sized speaker with the music on and let the sound waves do the rest. There was no mention of molecular structure of woods, though! :wink:


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:25 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:44 am
Posts: 7282
Location: Washington
Ceri wrote:
Haha - thank you! Assuming you found the right one, that is. Problematically, there seems to be a young blonde female model around at present with exactly the same name, and with whom I seem to have been mistaken at least once, to much bewilderment... :lol:


One thing I have learned over the last year is that you are not a young blonde female model. So I have high confidence that I found some of your accomplishments.

Quote:
His advice was to leave the guitar near a good sized speaker with the music on and let the sound waves do the rest. There was no mention of molecular structure of woods, though!


Getting the guitar's pickups too close to the magnets of some good sized speakers can certainly affect the future sound output! That's an experiment I don't wish to attempt, at least not until I get set up to remagnetize the AlNiCo pole pieces.

_________________
Member #26797
My other guitar is a Strat.

Image


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:30 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:57 am
Posts: 13164
Location: Peckham: where the snow leopards roam
orvilleowner wrote:
One thing I have learned over the last year is that you are not a young blonde female model...


Excellent - my work here is done!

:lol: - C


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:34 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 9034
Location: Louisiana
deleted! :wink:


Last edited by fhopkins on Fri May 08, 2009 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:35 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:44 am
Posts: 7282
Location: Washington
Ceri wrote:
Excellent - my work here is done!

:lol: - C


Do you give tours of Astoria?

Can you get me on stage with EC?

Does that phone booth have a trap door to David Bowie's hidden lair?

Is there really a spanner in the works?

_________________
Member #26797
My other guitar is a Strat.

Image


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:47 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:57 am
Posts: 13164
Location: Peckham: where the snow leopards roam
orvilleowner wrote:
Ceri wrote:
Excellent - my work here is done!

:lol: - C


Do you give tours of Astoria?

Can you get me on stage with EC?

Does that phone booth have a trap door to David Bowie's hidden lair?

Is there really a spanner in the works?


O-o-o-oh... Now don't you start!

:D - C


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:53 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:57 am
Posts: 13164
Location: Peckham: where the snow leopards roam
fhopkins wrote:
Ceri J. ?


Er, no.

Movin' swiftly on: I hear if you dunk your guitar in yoghurt it produces a fantastic tone. Helps the finish breathe better.

Or something...

:lol: - C


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 3:00 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 9034
Location: Louisiana
deleted on tuesday !:wink:


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 4:25 pm
Offline
Hobbyist
Hobbyist

Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 12:56 pm
Posts: 7
orvilleowner wrote:
Ceri wrote:
Haha - thank you! Assuming you found the right one, that is. Problematically, there seems to be a young blonde female model around at present with exactly the same name, and with whom I seem to have been mistaken at least once, to much bewilderment... :lol:


One thing I have learned over the last year is that you are not a young blonde female model. So I have high confidence that I found some of your accomplishments.

Quote:
His advice was to leave the guitar near a good sized speaker with the music on and let the sound waves do the rest. There was no mention of molecular structure of woods, though!


Getting the guitar's pickups too close to the magnets of some good sized speakers can certainly affect the future sound output! That's an experiment I don't wish to attempt, at least not until I get set up to remagnetize the AlNiCo pole pieces.


Agreed... and, well... said much the same to him and he laughed, saying "tell that to all the early players who thought that big amps were great guitar stands!" 8)

However, it seems that his main point had more to do with the pickups being left near enough to a good source of vibration to improve the "life" of the copper within.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 10:29 am
Offline
Amateur
Amateur

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:53 pm
Posts: 129
windwalker9649 wrote:
his pickup height is set with the middle pickup set much higher than the neck and bridge, which ive never seen.


That's actually a good idea. Since the middle pickup isn't used quite often as the bridge or the neck, why not set it closer to the strings to get a different kind of tone out of it to put it to better use?


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 12:05 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:44 am
Posts: 7282
Location: Washington
morrissey wrote:
That's actually a good idea. Since the middle pickup isn't used quite often as the bridge or the neck, why not set it closer to the strings to get a different kind of tone out of it to put it to better use?


Watch out though. If you set the middle pickup too close to the strings, the magnets may affect the string vibration and give your guitar the dreaded "Stratitis" disease.

_________________
Member #26797
My other guitar is a Strat.

Image


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 6:24 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:42 pm
Posts: 602
Location: New York, New York
That is actually a legitimate claim. Sound waves going through the wood really does help- especially on acoustics. One of the big guitar magazines did a test with a brand new Taylor that had been treated to several hours of sitting above a loud speaker and another that had not and everyone on their staff agreed hands-down that the sound wave treated guitar sounded better.

_________________
Custom Shop '59 Strat with John Cruz Master Design Pickups
Vibro King
Fulltone Clyde>Deja-Vibe>TS-808>TS-9>Boss Tuner


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: