highway one strat - final word

nikininja · **Posted:** Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:12 pm

If you check the dates on replies posted it hasnt been us that have rehashed this thread.

strat2004 · **Joined:** Sat May 23, 2009 5:12 pm **Posts:** 235

nikininja wrote:

If you check the dates on replies posted it hasnt been us that have rehashed this thread.

i know you two never do anything your just
so full of self information two genius's
just let the thread pass.

cvilleira · **Posted:** Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:19 pm

strat2004 wrote:

cvilleira wrote:

nikininja wrote:

The worst thing about the argumentative nature of this thread is that no one is disputing that the highway one is a good guitar. Best, well thats debatable and based on opinion.

I got brilliant on my mind! :lol:

Your are correct Niki I have heard no one say that it is a bad guitar. It's just that some have argued its merits incorrectly and by doing so it has been argumentive.
If someone said they liked the 9.5 neck on it with the old 70's headstck that would make sense. To say you like the neck because its old school does not because theres nothing old 70's about it other the head stock shape. To say you love the sound of the pickups would make sense but to say you love them because they sound old school would not. Its nothing old school about the pickups or the circut for them.
So some say its old school because it don't have many features but the ones it does in reality are not old school. To me thats the wrong why to try to make a point about the merits of the HWY. Fender sold people on that by just using the old looking head stock and not using its higher end new features nothing else. In reality it was how they were able to make it at a lower cost. Less money labor and parts. Many just go along with the sales pitch and believe. Nature of marketing.

so far CV its you and nik that keep rehashing
this thread.and anyone who owns this strat arnt realy interested what you think. so why dont you and nik just let this thread fade out and move on.

Sorry
Actually this post sat for many weeks until you started it back on June 6 and its now June 8 and you have made 21 post sinse the 6th. on this topic here. For someone not interested thats a lot of posting.
Also I am sure you have noticed I have not been stating opinions just design and business aspects on the recent talk. I did not no you spoke for everyone on the forum as to what they are interested in. I must have missed that vote.
And yes My last IQ test was 142 :wink:

strat2004 · **Joined:** Sat May 23, 2009 5:12 pm **Posts:** 235

cvilleira wrote:

strat2004 wrote:

cvilleira wrote:

nikininja wrote:

The worst thing about the argumentative nature of this thread is that no one is disputing that the highway one is a good guitar. Best, well thats debatable and based on opinion.

I got brilliant on my mind! :lol:

Your are correct Niki I have heard no one say that it is a bad guitar. It's just that some have argued its merits incorrectly and by doing so it has been argumentive.
If someone said they liked the 9.5 neck on it with the old 70's headstck that would make sense. To say you like the neck because its old school does not because theres nothing old 70's about it other the head stock shape. To say you love the sound of the pickups would make sense but to say you love them because they sound old school would not. Its nothing old school about the pickups or the circut for them.
So some say its old school because it don't have many features but the ones it does in reality are not old school. To me thats the wrong why to try to make a point about the merits of the HWY. Fender sold people on that by just using the old looking head stock and not using its higher end new features nothing else. In reality it was how they were able to make it at a lower cost. Less money labor and parts. Many just go along with the sales pitch and believe. Nature of marketing.

so far CV its you and nik that keep rehashing
this thread.and anyone who owns this strat arnt realy interested what you think. so why dont you and nik just let this thread fade out and move on.

Sorry
Actually this post sat for many weeks until you started it back on June 6 and its now June 8 and you have made 21 post sinse the 6th. on this topic here. For someone not interested thats a lot of posting.
Also I am sure you have noticed I have not been stating opinions just design and business aspects on the recent talk. I did not no you spoke for everyone on the forum as to what they are interested in. I must have missed that vote.

wrong again genius i didnt restart the thread.
check again.

cvilleira · **Posted:** Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:33 pm

strat2004 wrote:

cvilleira wrote:

strat2004 wrote:

cvilleira wrote:

nikininja wrote:

The worst thing about the argumentative nature of this thread is that no one is disputing that the highway one is a good guitar. Best, well thats debatable and based on opinion.

I got brilliant on my mind! :lol:

Your are correct Niki I have heard no one say that it is a bad guitar. It's just that some have argued its merits incorrectly and by doing so it has been argumentive.
If someone said they liked the 9.5 neck on it with the old 70's headstck that would make sense. To say you like the neck because its old school does not because theres nothing old 70's about it other the head stock shape. To say you love the sound of the pickups would make sense but to say you love them because they sound old school would not. Its nothing old school about the pickups or the circut for them.
So some say its old school because it don't have many features but the ones it does in reality are not old school. To me thats the wrong why to try to make a point about the merits of the HWY. Fender sold people on that by just using the old looking head stock and not using its higher end new features nothing else. In reality it was how they were able to make it at a lower cost. Less money labor and parts. Many just go along with the sales pitch and believe. Nature of marketing.

so far CV its you and nik that keep rehashing
this thread.and anyone who owns this strat arnt realy interested what you think. so why dont you and nik just let this thread fade out and move on.

Sorry
Actually this post sat for many weeks until you started it back on June 6 and its now June 8 and you have made 21 post sinse the 6th. on this topic here. For someone not interested thats a lot of posting.
Also I am sure you have noticed I have not been stating opinions just design and business aspects on the recent talk. I did not no you spoke for everyone on the forum as to what they are interested in. I must have missed that vote.

wrong again genius i didnt restart the thread.
check again.

"morrissey" then "by" followed by you on June 6 ,and I have scored higher then that before as well. Depends on the test. You will find I don't speak if I don't know what I am speaking about most times.

strat2004 · **Joined:** Sat May 23, 2009 5:12 pm **Posts:** 235

cvilleira wrote:

strat2004 wrote:

cvilleira wrote:

strat2004 wrote:

cvilleira wrote:

nikininja wrote:

The worst thing about the argumentative nature of this thread is that no one is disputing that the highway one is a good guitar. Best, well thats debatable and based on opinion.

I got brilliant on my mind! :lol:

Your are correct Niki I have heard no one say that it is a bad guitar. It's just that some have argued its merits incorrectly and by doing so it has been argumentive.
If someone said they liked the 9.5 neck on it with the old 70's headstck that would make sense. To say you like the neck because its old school does not because theres nothing old 70's about it other the head stock shape. To say you love the sound of the pickups would make sense but to say you love them because they sound old school would not. Its nothing old school about the pickups or the circut for them.
So some say its old school because it don't have many features but the ones it does in reality are not old school. To me thats the wrong why to try to make a point about the merits of the HWY. Fender sold people on that by just using the old looking head stock and not using its higher end new features nothing else. In reality it was how they were able to make it at a lower cost. Less money labor and parts. Many just go along with the sales pitch and believe. Nature of marketing.

so far CV its you and nik that keep rehashing
this thread.and anyone who owns this strat arnt realy interested what you think. so why dont you and nik just let this thread fade out and move on.

Sorry
Actually this post sat for many weeks until you started it back on June 6 and its now June 8 and you have made 21 post sinse the 6th. on this topic here. For someone not interested thats a lot of posting.
Also I am sure you have noticed I have not been stating opinions just design and business aspects on the recent talk. I did not no you spoke for everyone on the forum as to what they are interested in. I must have missed that vote.

wrong again genius i didnt restart the thread.
check again.

"morrissey" then "by" followed by you on June 6 ,and I have scored higher then that before as well. Depends on the test. You will find I don't speak if I don't know what I am speaking about most times.

now ask the 100,000 question WHO CARES!

nikininja · **Posted:** Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:42 pm

On the mensa test i took mine sometime around 92/93. Before british scores were altered and the test was scored on the american method (not letting on the result). Just after i took the test there was a big hoo haa about some experiment some organisation had conducted on south american tribes women using the standard type mensa paper. One day the majority were scoring 180+, the next day they werent making it into three figures. Thats why you now take multiple tests and your score is averaged to get a accurate overview of your score.

Just thought i'd add that bit.

cvilleira · **Posted:** Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:03 pm

nikininja wrote:

On the mensa test i took mine sometime around 92/93. Before british scores were altered and the test was scored on the american method (not letting on the result). Just after i took the test there was a big hoo haa about some experiment some organisation had conducted on south american tribes women using the standard type mensa paper. One day the majority were scoring 180+, the next day they werent making it into three figures. Thats why you now take multiple tests and your score is averaged to get a accurate overview of your score.

Just thought i'd add that bit.

Yep and then 59.00 a year out of your pocket now. My Mom and Dad insisted back in th late 70's :shock:

You don't argue with Moms and Dads well sometimes :wink:

Asia Carrera the porn star is a member! There is also several Boxers.

deepindigo114 · **Joined:** Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:56 am **Posts:** 186

I got my final word....and it's not about the Hwy 1. Why don't all the people that keep trying to defend something that isn't being attacked.....ahem....ahem alwaystrat....just close their whiney little mouth and then I think we can finally put this one to sleep.

ON ANOTHER NOTE. IF YOU ARE THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THIS FORUM PLEASE LOCK THIS THREAD BECAUSE IT IS CLEARLY AN ENDLESS PISSING MATCH WHICH WILL NEVER END WITHOUT SOME KIND OF OUTSIDE INTERVENTION

Brad Traweek - Fender · **Posted:** Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:39 pm

deepindigo114 wrote:

ON ANOTHER NOTE. IF YOU ARE THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THIS FORUM PLEASE LOCK THIS THREAD BECAUSE IT IS CLEARLY AN ENDLESS PISSING MATCH WHICH WILL NEVER END WITHOUT SOME KIND OF OUTSIDE INTERVENTION

Yes, I have to agree with you there -- this one's run its course IMHO. Locking.

	Page 8 of 8	[ 115 posts ]	Go to page Previous 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Go to page Previous 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

	Page 8 of 8	[ 115 posts ]	Go to page Previous 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Go to page Previous 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Andorra	EN	ES	FR
Belgium	EN	DE	FR
Croatia	EN
Czech Republic	EN
Estonia	EN
France	EN	FR
Germany	EN	DE
Italy	EN	IT
Latvia	EN
Lithuania	EN
Malta	EN
Netherlands	EN
Poland	EN
Romania	EN
Slovakia	EN
Sweden	EN
United Kingdom	EN

Austria	EN	DE
Bulgaria	EN
Cyprus	EN
Denmark	EN
Finland	EN
Greece	EN
Hungary	EN
Ireland	EN
Liechtenstein	EN	DE
Luxembourg	EN	DE	FR
Monaco	EN	FR
Norway	EN
Portugal	EN
Slovenia	EN
Spain	EN	ES
Switzerland	EN	DE	FR	IT

Mod Shop

Custom Shop

highway one strat - final word

Who is online