It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 6:54 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
Post subject: Question about the fretboard radius of vintage strats...
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:30 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 3355
Location: Houston, Texas
Back in the late 50's and early 60's did all strats have the same fretboard radius, and if they did what was it?

_________________
Website: http://www.rebeccalaird.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rebeccalairdmusic
Twitter: https://twitter.com/beckslaird
Instagram: http://instagram.com/beckslaird


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:33 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
7, 1/4" radius. 9.5" is a modern appointment. It is possible that some well worn guitars that have suffered many re-frets have worn in the center increasing the radius. I have a niggling suspicion that claptons blackie went that way, it is only a suspicion though.

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:57 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 3355
Location: Houston, Texas
I see. Yeah, I was just wondering about it since so many vintage reissue guitars have a 9.5" radius.

_________________
Website: http://www.rebeccalaird.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rebeccalairdmusic
Twitter: https://twitter.com/beckslaird
Instagram: http://instagram.com/beckslaird


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:27 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
Well yknow fender employ it for near all but vintage reissues. I'd take that as the only hint fender are going to give that its better than actual vintage spec's. Truth be told i prefer 7.25 but have found my tastes changing sedate music these days.

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:37 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 3355
Location: Houston, Texas
I thought I hated the 7.25, but the road worn I tried actually felt nice. I was kind of surprised by it.

_________________
Website: http://www.rebeccalaird.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rebeccalairdmusic
Twitter: https://twitter.com/beckslaird
Instagram: http://instagram.com/beckslaird


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:41 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:02 am
Posts: 8609
Location: Vacaville, CA USA
I prefer the 7.25 over the others.

_________________
Chet Feathers

Authorized TonePros Dealer
Authorized WD Music Products Dealer
F/A Official Southpaw Compliance Certification Tester http://faamps.com/

http://www.facebook.com/cafeathers


I didn't Lose my mind, I traded it for this guitar.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:45 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Posts: 7714
Location: Planet Earth
The vintage Fender radius is a comfortable neck to play but not friendly to those who like to bend because it will fret out.

_________________
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

Thomas Jefferson


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:47 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:02 am
Posts: 8609
Location: Vacaville, CA USA
cvilleira wrote:
The vintage Fender radius is a comfortable neck to play but not friendly to those who like to bend because it will fret out.


Never had an issue with fretting out.

_________________
Chet Feathers

Authorized TonePros Dealer
Authorized WD Music Products Dealer
F/A Official Southpaw Compliance Certification Tester http://faamps.com/

http://www.facebook.com/cafeathers


I didn't Lose my mind, I traded it for this guitar.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:51 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
i never bend much above 1.25 tones. Thats a rare extreme occurance for me these days too :shock:

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:54 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8461
Location: Mars, the angry red planet.
Back in the day, even prior to a refret, some fingerboards had the frets themselves compound radiused at the higher frets (mine included). This was because you simply couldn't have a lower action with light gauge strings. Anytime you wanted to really bend one of the first three strings starting around the the 14th fret, they would cut out due to the steep fingerboard radius. And in the case of the maple fingerboards, in addition to the bends cutting out, your fingers would be slipping off the strings at the same time due to the slick fingerboard and small frets. Also, there was no such thing as scalloping your neck back then. If I remember correctly, Ritchie Blackmore was the first to do it himself in the 70s.

_________________
You dig?


Last edited by Martian on Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:54 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Posts: 7714
Location: Planet Earth
CAFeathers wrote:
cvilleira wrote:
The vintage Fender radius is a comfortable neck to play but not friendly to those who like to bend because it will fret out.


Never had an issue with fretting out.

If I play a vintage neck and compare it to a 12" radius that bend difference is noticebly to me. To me the modern Fender radius is a compromise between the two.

_________________
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

Thomas Jefferson


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:12 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
Martian wrote:
Back in the day, even prior to a refret, some fingerboards had the frets themselves compound radiused at the higher frets (mine included). This was because you simply couldn't have a lower action with light gauge strings. Anytime you wanted to really bend one of the first three strings starting around the the 14th fret, they would cut out due to the steep fingerboard radius. And in the case of the maple fingerboards, in addition to the bends cutting out, your fingers would be slipping off the strings at the same time due to the slick fingerboard and small frets. Also, there was no such thing as scalloping your neck back then. If I remember correctly, Ritchie Blackmore was the first to do it himself in the 70s.


Wheres the 14th fret again? i stop at te 10th. :lol:

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: