For those who haven't seen one like it (I hadn't):

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Fender-Custom-Shop-66-Stratocaster-Closet-Classic-/110679505839?pt=Guitar&hash=item19c5033baf

Just imo, it seems a bit overboard.

I think it looks ok. It works better of jaguar style guitars than it does on strats.

Gibson do a sort of inverse matching headstock on the Thunderbird bass.

_________________
Rated "M" for meaty.

3/10, would not bang.

_________________
1984 Squier Contemporary Stratocaster
1986 Peavey Envoy 110
1967 Kingston Acoustic

I don't like three tone sunburst, the red band bothers me. However I think that guitar would look infinitely better with a rosewood fingerboard. The light maple is glaring.

_________________
No no and no

+1

The bullseye thing doesn't do it for me. Two tone can be very classy though, I find.

I agree,I don't like a bullseye 3TSB....I like it to blend....here's my '62 AVRI.

Don't like it, looks fugly! Never really cared for a matching headstock on any guitar. But I am a big fan of the sunburst. This just doesn't fade into the next color enough like that '62 AVRI above. Nice geet by the way!

_________________
2000 American Deluxe Stratocaster
2011 Gibson Les Paul Trad Pro 50's
2007 Epi Les Paul Custom
90's ESP Eclipse
JH-1B Jimi Hendrix Crybaby
Analogman KOT
Korg Pitchblack
Boss NS-2 PH-2
Blues Deluxe Reissue
1999 & 2007 Marshall TSL 100 w/1960BV cab

It looks horrid, IMO. I like the look of a nice matching headstock on a vintage instrument or even a nice reissue...but this is just wrong.

_________________
Blues with a feeling.

GUILD GUITARS: MADE TO BE PLAYED!

i think it looks cheap. not a huge fan of any type of sunburst as it is, and i do like matching headstocks, but that just looks poo.

YUKKK!!!!!!

_________________
Kindest regards from Germany, Dee
My recordings --> http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_mu ... dID=564337
STRATS ROCK!!! but Teles and Firebirds, too!