It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 10:18 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 251 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 17  Next
Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 17  Next
Author Message
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:22 am
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:15 am
Posts: 1018
Location: Glasgow
nikininja wrote:
Until you've played every transistor, digital and mosfet head in existence you can't make such claims.
All of this thread seems to be preference based on little experience. Confounded by typical guitar buyer rhetoric that we've been fed so much of that we can't help but repeat. Like a bunch of brainwashed imbeciles.

^^^^ Experience of what? Someone doesn't need to be an amp tech to form their own opinion. :lol:

_________________
Luck won't do it and ignorance can't

George Van Eps.


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:04 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 19026
Location: Illinois, USA
The 1st post is missing. I joked a bit before because I couldn't put in words how absurd the original post was but the writing style/word usage made it some what interesting. Ceri nailed it immediately and Niki has the patience of a saint. Thanks Bros.

Russell, very cool josh. I thought "Bernie Madoff".

Any liquidity vibe will generate from the player. :wink:

_________________
you can save the world with your guitar one love song at a time it's just better, more fun, easier with a fender solid body electric guitar or electric bass guitar.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:31 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 12:45 pm
Posts: 1169
RCB-CA-USA wrote:
I think a better way to describe what I perceive to be "liquidity" while playing a tube amp has to do with tube microphincs:

"All tubes will exhibit some degree of microphonics. Microphonics do not mean that a tube is unusable. You just have to screen them a little closer and determine where they are best suited for use. Input pre-amps are the most sensitive areas of the amplifier. When used in this application most tubes will generate some noise if you tap on them with a pencil during operation. Keep in mind that doing so can actually damage the tube and make it more microphonic or cause it to fail if you hit it real hard. Although they are screened prior to shipment a tube is an electromechanical device and can be damaged during shipment. A microphonic tube will ring, howl or produce general feedback problems. It will be more noticeable at louder volumes or when used in close proximity to a speaker, typically in combo amps."
http://thetubestore.com/12ax7review.html

The reason SS sounds sterile is the lack of simulation of tube microphincs, tube microphonics being influenced heavily by the sympathetic vibrations from within the playing area...the speakers, the guitar body and strings, etc., everything in the playing area will vibrate with or against the tubes.

SS needs to make a transistor that acts as a tube microphonics sensor to simulate tube microphonics to create a convincing tube feeling and sounding SS amp.

I'd shed heavy, hot tube amps for a SS amp that can simulate everything about a tube amp including tube microphincs, which is the only thing missing from SS where I'm sitting.

...soon, we'll see an adjustment for tube microphonics in SS amp simulators to adjust and tailor the saturation, type, and amount of the room vibrations the sensor picks up like a tube would from the room where the amp sits, us being able to adjust the "liquidity" of the feel and sound to facilitate ease of expressive, dynamic playing via enhanced sustain, over-tones, and feedback where you can use a delicate touch or gritty dig in a relaxed state like you can with a real tube amp but not a SS amp. Done.

If that don't makes sense... :roll:

What test equipment can detect "sympathetic tube vibration"?

_________________
In my opinion Leo Fender had essentially perfected the guitar amplifier by 1964.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:47 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:21 am
Posts: 959
Ceri wrote:
inbalance99 wrote:
...maple vs rosewood necks...

Far as that one's concerned, it would be quite easy to design a test, and sooner or later I'd like to take a crack at it. Of course, it couldn't be me who then performed the test, or it wouldn't be a double-blind.
Cheers - C


I have the guitars for that one: two 2004 American Series (American Series not American Standard...thanks for teaching me that one, Ceri) Strats. Both exactly the same down to the 3-tone sunbursts, except for the fingerboards. The problem for me is having zero recording or video capabilities at this point.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:17 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1524
Location: OZ
boxbang wrote:
Great thread. Although I have nothing technical to contribute, it's a good read and an education.
Keep it up gentlemen.
You guys are heaps cooler than Train-Spotters and Trekkies. 8)



:lol: :lol:

+1000

Heaps cooler!! 8)

Intense stuff I love it!!!

:wink:

_________________
Image


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:50 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1281
mhowell wrote:
RCB-CA-USA wrote:
I think a better way to describe what I perceive to be "liquidity" while playing a tube amp has to do with tube microphincs:

"All tubes will exhibit some degree of microphonics. Microphonics do not mean that a tube is unusable. You just have to screen them a little closer and determine where they are best suited for use. Input pre-amps are the most sensitive areas of the amplifier. When used in this application most tubes will generate some noise if you tap on them with a pencil during operation. Keep in mind that doing so can actually damage the tube and make it more microphonic or cause it to fail if you hit it real hard. Although they are screened prior to shipment a tube is an electromechanical device and can be damaged during shipment. A microphonic tube will ring, howl or produce general feedback problems. It will be more noticeable at louder volumes or when used in close proximity to a speaker, typically in combo amps."
http://thetubestore.com/12ax7review.html

The reason SS sounds sterile is the lack of simulation of tube microphincs, tube microphonics being influenced heavily by the sympathetic vibrations from within the playing area...the speakers, the guitar body and strings, etc., everything in the playing area will vibrate with or against the tubes.

SS needs to make a transistor that acts as a tube microphonics sensor to simulate tube microphonics to create a convincing tube feeling and sounding SS amp.

I'd shed heavy, hot tube amps for a SS amp that can simulate everything about a tube amp including tube microphincs, which is the only thing missing from SS where I'm sitting.

...soon, we'll see an adjustment for tube microphonics in SS amp simulators to adjust and tailor the saturation, type, and amount of the room vibrations the sensor picks up like a tube would from the room where the amp sits, us being able to adjust the "liquidity" of the feel and sound to facilitate ease of expressive, dynamic playing via enhanced sustain, over-tones, and feedback where you can use a delicate touch or gritty dig in a relaxed state like you can with a real tube amp but not a SS amp. Done.

If that don't makes sense... :roll:

What test equipment can detect "sympathetic tube vibration"?


Informally, me and my fingers and my soul of souls, where the music is, can detect this tangible, mechanical effect.

Formally, any highly sensitive motion sensor...no, not like we use with alarms, we're talking scientific ultra sensitive (can detect mouse farts), something that can pickup up vibrations ping ponging back and forth between the tube amp and the rest of the room contents, possibly a smoke filled room, a slow-mo video showing the smoke being affected by the sympathetic vibrations.

An oscilloscope shows the difference between the tube state and SS sine waves, so...the sympathetic vibration are there, everybody overlooked it I guess and now we just need to dig deep and get the technology going.

BTW, I love the vibe of this thread...I'm getting some really cool sympathetic vibrations and I feel all liquidy! :P

And no, I am *not* Joshing here. I am...(hypothetically) holding a Leo Fender prototype tele type serious -- this is a sacred act I am doing here and will have a huge effect on the outcome of SS technologies simulating tube amps.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:59 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:56 pm
Posts: 4033
Location: 16 Miles North Of The Red River
Scientific research vs. Personal Anecdotes vs. New Age Vibronics...it's all been said.

For someone to keep repeating the same (vaguely) inarticulate statement while using terms not easily or officially recognized by the general guitar-playing public speaks volumes about the argument.

There is a bit of indescribable "vibe" and "feel" to certain devices and pieces of equipment (for example, I love my MXR MicroAmp stompbox...it does more than just boost the gain/volume, but I can't really describe it except by saying it give me "more of me" in my signal; it makes no sense, but that's how I describe it)...I agree there is something special about a tube amp that is hard to find in a solid state one, but based on playing many solid state amps, I can't say that there's not any that CAN'T "do it" for me.

It's usually a highly personalized, specific feeling that is only experienced by an individual person...RCB, I think that's what you are trying to describe, but I have to agree with the Ninja; to dismiss an entire type of equipment based on a tickle in your pickle is somewhat short-sighted.

Personally, this is how I feel about the topic at this point:

Image

_________________
Good Vibes To Y'all!

Image

Screamin' Armadillos
Texas Roadhouse Music
Guitar/Slide Guitar/Harp/Vocals


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:40 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1281
Screamin' Armadillo wrote:
[b]Scientific research vs. Personal Anecdotes vs. New Age Vibronics...There is a bit of indescribable "vibe" and "feel" to certain devices and pieces of equipment...I agree there is something special about a tube amp that is hard to find in a solid state...RCB, I think that's what you are trying to describe, but I have to agree with the Ninja; to dismiss an entire type of equipment based on a tickle in your pickle is somewhat short-sighted...


...tickle in my pickle, goin' liquid, same thing. It's part n' parcel to my rep·er·toire. I'm so sorry you haven't found your pickle but have found...pickled boots...how does that effect your playing? lol!

Homey, if it ain't got no tickle in ur pickle, it ain't worth a nickel!

Peace! 8)


Last edited by RCB-CA-USA on Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:41 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1281
...


Last edited by RCB-CA-USA on Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:41 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1281
...


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:25 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 12:45 pm
Posts: 1169
RCB-CA-USA wrote:
mhowell wrote:
What test equipment can detect "sympathetic tube vibration"?


Informally, me and my fingers and my soul of souls, where the music is, can detect this tangible, mechanical effect.

Formally, any highly sensitive motion sensor...no, not like we use with alarms, we're talking scientific ultra sensitive (can detect mouse farts), something that can pickup up vibrations ping ponging back and forth between the tube amp and the rest of the room contents, possibly a smoke filled room, a slow-mo video showing the smoke being affected by the sympathetic vibrations.

An oscilloscope shows the difference between the tube state and SS sine waves, so...the sympathetic vibration are there, everybody overlooked it I guess and now we just need to dig deep and get the technology going.

BTW, I love the vibe of this thread...I'm getting some really cool sympathetic vibrations and I feel all liquidy! :P

And no, I am *not* Joshing here. I am...(hypothetically) holding a Leo Fender prototype tele type serious -- this is a sacred act I am doing here and will have a huge effect on the outcome of SS technologies simulating tube amps.


I'm trying to nail down what you're talking about.

Are you saying that the micro-phonics of a tube will pick up the sound waves from the speaker (or other sonic sources), which then physically disturb the tube elements (plate, grid, cathode, etc), which in turn modify the signal? This is conceivable but I seriously doubt such a feedback loop could cause the "liquidity" that you claim.

The affects would be far more subtle than any parameter typically considered in amplifier design. Not to mention the fact that no two tubes share the same micro-phonic properties. I seriously doubt this could be detected on an oscilloscope. I'm willing to be corrected if you can show it and not just assert it as fact.

Cheers,

_________________
In my opinion Leo Fender had essentially perfected the guitar amplifier by 1964.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:24 am
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1281
mhowell wrote:
I'm trying to nail down what you're talking about.

Thank you!

mhowell wrote:
Are you saying that the micro-phonics of a tube will pick up the sound waves from the speaker (or other sonic sources), which then physically disturb the tube elements (plate, grid, cathode, etc), which in turn modify the signal? This is conceivable but I seriously doubt such a feedback loop could cause the "liquidity" that you claim.

Close! I'm saying particularly that it's the feel of the guitar interacting with tube microphonics and the signal chain, and to a lesser degree, everything else in the room, that creates a physical sympathetic resonance that facilitates a much more fluid and creative playing state, a simulation not built into SS but doable in SS with an element/sensor built into SS that feels what a tube would feel, the electrical characteristics of this fed into the signal picture changing the SS signal from squarish to roundish to get the sympathetic vibration going.

mhowell wrote:
The affects would be far more subtle than any parameter typically considered in amplifier design. Not to mention the fact that no two tubes share the same micro-phonic properties. I seriously doubt this could be detected on an oscilloscope. I'm willing to be corrected if you can show it and not just assert it as fact.

Cheers,

If you will recall from a previous post, that's why the feature would have parameters that can be adjusted to dial in the flavor of a particular size/resonance tube. All tubes will have a harmonic resonance that can be used as the basis for the sensitivity of the sensor. Since we can do dimensional computer engineering, you can design a sensor that acts like a tube vibrating with other similar materials, maybe even the same shape but smaller, then amplified.

pickle boots made a good point...it's like puttin' tickle in the pickle as it moves along the signal chain to convince it to go round instead of being all square faced and dull, which affects how I play electric guitar. You get the sympathetic effect of a tube on an acoustic guitar, it's like holding a big tube with strings attached to it, yo!

Good questions!

Cheers mate!


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:37 am
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:38 am
Posts: 650
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada. USA
After scouring the internet for any scientific manner as to how to achieve this sympathetic vibration in a SS configuration, I think I may have found a feasible way for it to be done.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aTagDSnclk

Simply install this apparatus to the back of a SS amp, purchase a similar Felis Silvestris Catus, ans strap it on to the top of the amp. From that you should be able to accurately simulate said sympathetic vibration heightening the senses in the room to further achieve liquid status.

_________________
Image


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:40 am
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1281
mhowell wrote:
I'm trying to nail down what you're talking about.

Thank you!

mhowell wrote:
Are you saying that the micro-phonics of a tube will pick up the sound waves from the speaker (or other sonic sources), which then physically disturb the tube elements (plate, grid, cathode, etc), which in turn modify the signal? This is conceivable but I seriously doubt such a feedback loop could cause the "liquidity" that you claim.

Close! I'm saying particularly that it's the feel of the guitar interacting with tube microphonics and the signal chain, and to a lesser degree, everything else in the room, a physical sympathetic loop of sound that creates a physical sympathetic resonance that facilitates a much more fluid and creative playing state, a simulation not built into SS but doable in SS with an element/sensor built into SS that feels what a tube would feel, the electrical characteristics of this fed into the signal picture changing the SS signal from squarish to roundish to get the sympathetic vibration going.

mhowell wrote:
The affects would be far more subtle than any parameter typically considered in amplifier design. Not to mention the fact that no two tubes share the same micro-phonic properties. I seriously doubt this could be detected on an oscilloscope. I'm willing to be corrected if you can show it and not just assert it as fact.

Cheers,

If you will recall from a previous post, that's why the sensor would have parameters that can be adjusted to dial in the flavor of a particular size/resonance tube. All tubes will have a harmonic resonance that can be established and used as the basis for the sensitivity and adjustment of the sensor. Since we can do dimensional computer engineering, we can design a sensor that acts like a hollow, electrically filled tube vibrating with other amp materials, maybe a sensor the same shape but smaller, then amplified, who knows, it's just in the concept state of design.

pickle boots made a good point...it's like puttin' tickle in the pickle, sympathetic room vibrations that effects how a guitar feels and reacts. You get the sympathetic effect of a tube effect on an acoustic guitar, it's like holding a big tube with strings attached to it, yo! A good acoustic always puts tickle in my pickle and I can go liquid on an acoustic that's got good sympathetic vibrations too.

Good questions!

Cheers mate!


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: Tube vs Solid State - A double blind test
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:14 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
RCB-CA-USA via some site wrote:
"All tubes will exhibit some degree of microphonics. Microphonics do not mean that a tube is unusable. You just have to screen them a little closer and determine where they are best suited for use. Input pre-amps are the most sensitive areas of the amplifier. When used in this application most tubes will generate some noise if you tap on them with a pencil during operation. Keep in mind that doing so can actually damage the tube and make it more microphonic or cause it to fail if you hit it real hard. Although they are screened prior to shipment a tube is an electromechanical device and can be damaged during shipment. A microphonic tube will ring, howl or produce general feedback problems. It will be more noticeable at louder volumes or when used in close proximity to a speaker, typically in combo amps."
http://thetubestore.com/12ax7review.html


Incorrect, completely.

The Mullard, long plate, square getter, white lettering thermionic Ecc83 valve was constructed to be completely free of any microphonics and remain so for it's lifespan. Reason being any microphonic interference would have caused early detonation of the nuclear warhead it was used in.

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 251 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 17  Next
Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: