It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 5:55 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:07 am
Offline
Amateur
Amateur
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:16 pm
Posts: 182
Location: KY
Nevin1985 wrote:
PS I have a Telecaster I have played.. maybe 2 hours total. :lol:

Image

Still has the old tag on it. Well not on it, in the case compartment (that I have not opened in 2 years)

And then there is this one that I just like to look at. No real intention of playing it much. Maybe 4 hours play time on this one.

Image

Does this make me a bad person? I love them too much to ding them up.


You can love a guitar and play it and not ding it up.

A guitar might be pretty enough to be an art piece, but it wasn't created and intended to be one.

_________________
2006 Fender AVRI 70s Stratocaster: Natural Ash | Sovtek MIG 60 & A No Name Cabinet | Pedals & Junk


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:08 am
Offline
Amateur
Amateur
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:16 pm
Posts: 182
Location: KY
fhopkins wrote:
If I'm NS then I'm cool with statement number 2!! :wink:


Oops. Most of your name got cut off in the thread review box below the reply form. Sorry, NS. :P

_________________
2006 Fender AVRI 70s Stratocaster: Natural Ash | Sovtek MIG 60 & A No Name Cabinet | Pedals & Junk


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:10 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 9034
Location: Louisiana
:lol: I kind of like NS!!


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:07 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:38 am
Posts: 4333
Location: Tennessee
Well,having grown up playing Fender Strats and Gibson Les Pauls in the '60s,and watching my uncle and his friends play them in the late '50s....yeah,there were good ones and not so good ones,but you could afford to play many of them and buy the one that was the best.
Now you can't touch one unless you're just about rich...I mean,I will not pay $35,000 for a Strat that might play and sound good, when my modern ones play and sound so good.
I just wish I had bought as many as I could when they were going for $200....but who knew that people were going to go nuts over them? :roll:
Man,we would have never thought about making a new guitar look like it had been dragged behind a wagon...just to look OLD!


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:15 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 pm
Posts: 2621
Location: Sunny So Cal
The reason for collecting "old stuff" is that as it gets older, there are fewer examples of it around. It's not that they are better than the product produced today (often times they are inferior) it's a rarity thing. If there were 10,000 '57 Stratocasters out there, they wouldn't be rare and therefore wouldn't cost much.

Yes I tend to think it's silly, but to each his own.

_________________
"Life is like eating jalapenos. What you do today may burn your arse tomorrow"
Image


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:19 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:17 pm
Posts: 2178
Location: Ciudad de los Reyes
phoenix-caster wrote:

5.) BlackCatBone: The only other places that I can think of that buys into the vintage hype as bad as we have in recent times are Japan and most of Europe. I can see them following our suit when interest begins to trail off and more stuff is being made here again (it'll eventually happen; China won't be able to give the US cheap labor for much longer ...).
.

Japan and Most of Europe is a significant enough market to sustain vintage instruments though. You can't see them following our suit but bottom line is the vintage market will never just be undesirable. Prices will adjust in the market before it just dries up and people just lose interest altogether. Even if we start making stuff here again (and that wont be in our lifetimes if at all) those newly made guitars will never have the value or desirability that true vintage instruments do.

I respectfully disagree but respect your opinion on this topic.

_________________
Blues with a feeling.
ImageImage
GUILD GUITARS: MADE TO BE PLAYED!


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:51 pm
Offline
Amateur
Amateur
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:16 pm
Posts: 182
Location: KY
nikininja wrote:
A lot of vintage Fender owners will tell you that mostly modern guitars are superior.


If that's the case, then the vintage market really makes no sense.

"Vaporware" ... that word comes to mind.

nikininja wrote:
Makes sense when you think about it. A 54 strat has what 3/4 years experience behind it's manufacture. A 2010 guitar has 24 years experience of manufacture behind it.

I'm with you Pheonix, I don't want some ropey old junk cluttering the place up. *mostly*.


My last "vintage" purchase was my Airline amp, and that was the last reason why I bought it. I took it home because a.) it's a Valco-built amp and I really dig the tone, b.) it was only $120 bucks, c.) it was in great shape (except for two nicks in the old cheap thin tolex-wannabe covering and some yellowing in the grille cloth), d.) I liked it over a new Champion 600 which would have been more expensive in the long run, and e.) it's a no nonsense one-knob amp that's very good for testing out guitars and pedals with. I never run anything piece of gear I buy new into the Super 112 without running it into the Airline first.

If the cabinet were falling apart and it sounded terrible, I would have passed on it without looking back.

nikininja wrote:
Personaly I just don't see why CBS guitars are getting any increase in value at all. Their hit and miss pieces, ok the earlier ones are as Jeffytune said, decent guitars. The latter ones less so. I just don't see how they can have a blanket increase in value. If you're going to be a purist about it, they are only a Fender as much as say a FMIC or Squier guitar is. Their not like the FMC guitars that were made by the man himself.


I blame the collectors. When they couldn't buy anymore pre-CBS stuff cheap, they had to think up some BS to drive the prices on the stuff they had bought up.

nikininja wrote:
For instance would you be happy to shell out muchos spondoolicks on say a 77 strat that was a real dog. One of the really bad unplayable ones?
Would you be happier to pay more for say a 57 that was as much of a dog? For arguments sake say both are all original.


I'd pass on them both.

mthorn00 wrote:
The reason for collecting "old stuff" is that as it gets older, there are fewer examples of it around. It's not that they are better than the product produced today (often times they are inferior) it's a rarity thing. If there were 10,000 '57 Stratocasters out there, they wouldn't be rare and therefore wouldn't cost much.

Yes I tend to think it's silly, but to each his own.


If that's the case, my Superhawk should have brought well over a grand when I sold it. It was over 25 years old. It was technically vintage/antique. G&L didn't build a whole lot of them (because they didn't sell) and Leo Fender was around when it was built, even though he didn't actually build the guitar himself by hand.

No, instead I sold it for pretty much what I had in it because no one outside of a few very devoted Jerry Cantrell and G&L fans knew what it was. And because of that, no one knew if it was a decent guitar or not and passed on it. Those guitars will never have much of any value (which I'm more than okay with; the more of them I find that I can buy cheap, the better).

BlackCatBone wrote:
Japan and Most of Europe is a significant enough market to sustain vintage instruments though. You can't see them following our suit but bottom line is the vintage market will never just be undesirable. Prices will adjust in the market before it just dries up and people just lose interest altogether. Even if we start making stuff here again (and that wont be in our lifetimes if at all) those newly made guitars will never have the value or desirability that true vintage instruments do.

I respectfully disagree but respect your opinion on this topic.


Oh, we'll see more US production during our lifetime, that I'm sure of. China is demanding better wages and better working conditions. Slowly but surely their manufacturing strength will diminish to the point where it'll be too expensive to make stuff for export cheaply. That's why Wham-o moved their production back home, the cost didn't justify the means anymore and the quality wasn't really there.

I will say this for Gibson: they've always made guitars somewhere in the U.S. and I think Fender should really follow suit here. Reintroduce the Musicmaster and Duo-Sonic to take on the Melody Maker since Gibson is selling those again and building them here in the U.S. and only for $400 brand new to boot. The American Special guitars prove you can make a quality American instrument for under $1,000 and they're desirable. They obviously sell or else Fender would have ended production of them by now.

I will say Gibson is bad for wanting to over-reinvent the wheel, though. At least Fender hasn't built something as useless as the Robot-Series guitars or the Firebird X. They just have way too many variations on the same theme, IMHO.

Nevin1985 wrote:
I don't see what is so hard to understand about why vintage guitars command high prices. You are looking at the birth of something new. Yes, there were electric guitars before Fender, but you are buying HISTORY.

It is the historical aspect that drives up value. It is very simple.


History doesn't dictate tone. Not that I'm saying you said that, but still I thought I would throw that out there while I had that thought.

My Airline amp is a piece of history technically then. It's almost 50 years old. Yet it only cost me $120.

I bought a vintage Zippo from 1964 still in the case for only $15 bucks. It's a piece of history too.

History drives up value? That's not always the case and it shouldn't be.

There is an exception, though, like if someone wrote a hit single on it. But not a lot of instruments wear such a title around and some of those that do aren't vintage, either.

_________________
2006 Fender AVRI 70s Stratocaster: Natural Ash | Sovtek MIG 60 & A No Name Cabinet | Pedals & Junk


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:16 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:29 am
Posts: 4238
Location: Pgh Pa
I understand Phoenixs point however I don,t feel so strongly about it. I would never buy a vintage guitar to just put it away. If I ever get to buy a 62 strat I would play it until the neck looked like a tooth pick. But thats just me.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:01 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 9449
Location: NL Canada
As an absolutely fanatical player and avid but smalltime(29)collector I love vintage instruments and have several from the 60s and one from the 70s. Granted there were dogs made back then too but I have been lucky enough to find exquisite instruments,my '65 Strat,Mustang and Jag being just 3.There is something about the tone of the early to mid 60s Fenders that sets them apart from all others,especially the L series Strats.If you are lucky enough to find a good example of an L series Strat you will immediately notice the difference in the tone.My '65 has a B neck and the first time I picked it up in 1974 it felt like it had been custom made to fit my hands-and I have small hands.Even though B necks were all the same width it seems that there were at least 2 different profiles-the C and the D- mine had the C low profile which made the world of difference.If I could find a decent '65 for 10 grand I'd jump at the chance-if I could afford 10 grand.

_________________
'65 Strat,65 Mustang,65 Jaguar,4 more Strats,3 vintage Vox guitars,5 Vox amps,'69 Bassman with a '68 2-15 Bassman cab,36 guitars total-15asst'd amps total,2 vintage '60s Hammond organs & a myriad of effects-with a few rare vintage ones.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:52 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:21 am
Posts: 331
Location: Normal, Illinois
I like vintage gear. As long as I get ridiculously good deals on it... Only happened twice so far. :lol:


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:51 am
Offline
Amateur
Amateur
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:16 pm
Posts: 182
Location: KY
Nevin1985 wrote:
Ugh, I didn't think I would have to explain myself this in depth. Why do people want to collect vintage guitars and why do I consider them a part of history?

Fender and Gibson produced the most popular solid body electric guitars of the time. They were new fangled. Electric bass. That was groundbreaking!

They are collectible because they are the dawn of an era! Do I really have to explain it? People like to collect things, rare things and early examples just make collecting that much more interesting.

Why do people collect vintage Les Pauls? Well in their time they did not sell well, but then artists began using them and recording mega albums etc. Thus, people want to own that guitar too.

Why am I wasting time writing this.


If that era had long since ended, things would make a lot more sense.

The electric bass guitar was groundbreaking ... and popular. We still have those because of that.

History doesn't justify 300 to 1,000 times inflation in price/value, I'm sorry. Not when it comes to guitars. Maybe if we're talking about Lincoln's tophat. That has universal historic significance. But a '65 Strat ... yeah, not so much.

guitslinger wrote:
As an absolutely fanatical player and avid but smalltime(29)collector I love vintage instruments and have several from the 60s and one from the 70s. Granted there were dogs made back then too but I have been lucky enough to find exquisite instruments,my '65 Strat,Mustang and Jag being just 3.There is something about the tone of the early to mid 60s Fenders that sets them apart from all others,especially the L series Strats.If you are lucky enough to find a good example of an L series Strat you will immediately notice the difference in the tone.My '65 has a B neck and the first time I picked it up in 1974 it felt like it had been custom made to fit my hands-and I have small hands.Even though B necks were all the same width it seems that there were at least 2 different profiles-the C and the D- mine had the C low profile which made the world of difference.If I could find a decent '65 for 10 grand I'd jump at the chance-if I could afford 10 grand.


You actually play your instruments. Really, I think you've just had a very bad case of GAS all these years. :lol:

You're not of the ilk who buys a vintage guitar and frames it like an original Van Gogh. It's those folks I really cannot stand at all. Your instruments are in good hands, IMHO. You've also kept them all these years to boot. 8)

_________________
2006 Fender AVRI 70s Stratocaster: Natural Ash | Sovtek MIG 60 & A No Name Cabinet | Pedals & Junk


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 3:20 am
Offline
Amateur
Amateur

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 5:14 am
Posts: 140
phoenix-caster wrote:

History doesn't justify 300 to 1,000 times inflation in price/value, I'm sorry. Not when it comes to guitars.


Supply and demand "justifies" it. You are maybe perplexed because you do not feel that level of demand.


Quote:
Maybe if we're talking about Lincoln's tophat. That has universal historic significance. But a '65 Strat ... yeah, not so much.


Bet Robert E. Lee's hat would get more on Ebay than Lincoln's.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 5:32 am
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:17 pm
Posts: 2178
Location: Ciudad de los Reyes
phoenix-caster wrote:

Oh, we'll see more US production during our lifetime, that I'm sure of.


OK, since you're "sure".

_________________
Blues with a feeling.
ImageImage
GUILD GUITARS: MADE TO BE PLAYED!


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:31 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:38 am
Posts: 4333
Location: Tennessee
I believe guitars are made to be played also,a guitar,or any musical instrument,in a case for looks just dies a slow death.
that's what gripes me about collectors who don't play what they can afford,it's an ego trip for most of them...imho.
Anyway,I think Nathan Bedford Forrest's 1836 Navy Colt pistol would bring more than Abe's and R.E.Lee's hats! :lol:


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 3:36 pm
Offline
Professional Musician
Professional Musician

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:45 pm
Posts: 1271
Retroverbial wrote:
(obviously a phillistine......)

:mrgreen:

Arjay
It's the nonplaying collectors that drive the price up. :evil:


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: