It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 6:02 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 5:13 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 9449
Location: NL Canada
I endured a program last week with Jesse Ventura and he was trying his darndest it seems to put the blame of 911 directly on the U.S. gov. even stating that they knew there were terrorists on at least one of the planes before it was cleared for takeoff.He also made allusions to it being an inside job engineered by the U.S. gov. also-anything to get the ratings up I suppose-that guy is a loose cannon.

_________________
'65 Strat,65 Mustang,65 Jaguar,4 more Strats,3 vintage Vox guitars,5 Vox amps,'69 Bassman with a '68 2-15 Bassman cab,36 guitars total-15asst'd amps total,2 vintage '60s Hammond organs & a myriad of effects-with a few rare vintage ones.


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 5:32 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:39 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: teh webz?
guitslinger wrote:
I endured a program last week with Jesse Ventura and he was trying his darndest it seems to put the blame of 911 directly on the U.S. gov. even stating that they knew there were terrorists on at least one of the planes before it was cleared for takeoff.He also made allusions to it being an inside job engineered by the U.S. gov. also-anything to get the ratings up I suppose-that guy is a loose cannon.

im not saying i agree with him, but with things like this people often dismiss it as nonsense before hearing ANYTHING about it... there IS evidence supporting those claims, but i do still think it was a non-US job

_________________
Favorite bands:

Melvins
The Jesus Lizard
Cows
Big Business
R***man
Minutemen
Flight
Minor Threat
Big Black
Shellac
Karp
Scratch Acid
Wipers
Pixies


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 5:53 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 19026
Location: Illinois, USA
:roll: , no wait, there was a, oh yeah there it is :roll:

_________________
you can save the world with your guitar one love song at a time it's just better, more fun, easier with a fender solid body electric guitar or electric bass guitar.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:00 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician

Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:33 am
Posts: 650
Nevin1985 wrote:
Image



Official Conspiracy Theory

Image

They are all a bunch of nuts.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:08 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:39 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: teh webz?
Twinhit wrote:
Nevin1985 wrote:
Image



Official Conspiracy Theory

Image

They are all a bunch of nuts.

different view =/= nuts... also not all who believe conspiracy theories are tin foil hat wearing morons with "AN ALIUM EEEEEYYYAN THA SSSHHHYYYYEEED!!!!!!!!!"

_________________
Favorite bands:

Melvins
The Jesus Lizard
Cows
Big Business
R***man
Minutemen
Flight
Minor Threat
Big Black
Shellac
Karp
Scratch Acid
Wipers
Pixies


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:16 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician

Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:33 am
Posts: 650
guitslinger wrote:
I endured a program last week with Jesse Ventura and he was trying his darndest it seems to put the blame of 911 directly on the U.S. gov. even stating that they knew there were terrorists on at least one of the planes before it was cleared for takeoff.He also made allusions to it being an inside job engineered by the U.S. gov. also-anything to get the ratings up I suppose-that guy is a loose cannon.


Guts, I hadn't seen that, but Ventura has been questioning 911 for some time. I don't think has anything to do with his show either, which after all is a venue for alternative opinions to be presented.

If I am not mistaken, it was Sen. Arlen Specter who suggested the magic bullet theory.


Top
Profile
Post subject: terror=con?
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:25 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:20 pm
Posts: 9640
Location: Indiana
nikininja wrote:
You guys that don't believe this current war of terror is nothing more than a diversionary ploy ever ask yourselves 'exactly who do the nations owe all this money to? What do we owe this money for?'
It's well worth thinking about.

For all you people that persist in believing in the lie that is modern democracy. Remember the London underground bombings. Funny how they took all the attention from the G9 summit and the Geldof gangs plea for those nations present at the summit to cancel 3rd world debt.
Surely it would have been far cheaper to do that than continually bail them out with international aid. Especially when you're in the midst of a economic depression.

Get your thinking caps on lads. :wink:


Agree 100%! These "emergencies" are necessary (for them) to gain more power, and divert attention, while appearing that they are doing something about it. This reminds me of the first Matrix movie, when Keaneu Reeves could not accept reality after he was brought out of the Matrix, he freaked out, then he vomited and passed out. I think that personifies many people today, they just cannot accept reality, no matter how hard it smacks them in the face. :idea:

_________________
---> "The amp should be SWITCHED OFF AND UNPLUGGED before you do this!" <---

Por favor, disculpe mi español, no se llega a la práctica con mucha frecuencia.


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: terror=con?
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:52 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
shimmilou wrote:
Agree 100%! These "emergencies" are necessary (for them) to gain more power, and divert attention, while appearing that they are doing something about it. This reminds me of the first Matrix movie, when Keaneu Reeves could not accept reality after he was brought out of the Matrix, he freaked out, then he vomited and passed out. I think that personifies many people today, they just cannot accept reality, no matter how hard it smacks them in the face. :idea:


Make life too easy and it will all fall apart!

Yeah I could go with that.

All it is with me I don't care what anyone believes about recent disasters. Their just that disasters. You gotta do the best you can with your life and live to the best of your abilities. That is the main reason I won't vote. I won't belittle my existence by participating in a sham. I've far better things to do, like examining my belly button for fluff. A good half hour doing that impacts my life far more than scribbling a X on a bit of paper ever did. Y'know why the Obama administration hasn't made any headway`in sorting out your countries finances. Because doing so doesn't coincide with what his boss wants. It's exactly the same in this country. We just enjoyed a load of goverment spending cuts that aren't going to do anything other than prepare us for harder times ahead. Until we stop bowing to hidden masters, we'll never come out of this financial depression. We need to stop kowtowing to bankers.

Think what you like, but think. Thats my motto taken from the quote below.


Voltaire wrote:
Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so, too.

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 2:22 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician

Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:33 am
Posts: 650
Floyd_The_Barber wrote:
Twinhit wrote:
Nevin1985 wrote:
Image



Official Conspiracy Theory

Image

They are all a bunch of nuts.

different view =/= nuts... also not all who believe conspiracy theories are tin foil hat wearing morons with "AN ALIUM EEEEEYYYAN THA SSSHHHYYYYEEED!!!!!!!!!"


It's funny when the Government says "We are here to help" and people cringe. But then those same people will believe the Official "THEORY" concerning 911 and take it for fact.
Buildings don't just come crashing down. A B-25 Mitchell hit the Empire State Building. It didn't bring that building down.
Maybe they built the building much better back then.

Another thing is Building 7. It didn't get hit by a plane, though it did suffer damage from one the tower's collapse. Yet it came down when the decision to "pull it" was made that afternoon. - per Silverstein
Most people forget that.

Also it takes a good deal of time to demo a building. How does Building 7 come down at near freefall speed like a demolition job and not be a demolition job.

Also of note, they didn't find WMDs in Iraq. Bush is quoted as saying that Bin Ladin is no longer relevant.
Benazar Bhutto said Bin Ladin was murdered. She then gets knocked off some two weeks later.

As for theories, my personal theory is that the buildings "may" have had strategically built-in devices that would go off in the event the building were to threaten to topple over onto adjacent buildings rather than collapse in on itself.
IF I am right, these devices would have been viewed as safety devices some 45+ years ago and had simply sat dormant all these years and the decision to "pull it" on the towers came when the threat against the adjacent buildings was percieved. Larry Silverstein was referring to building 7 when he made his remarks.

The towers were sometimes called "Nelson and David".
A company called ACE elevator company serviced the tower's elevators.
They filed Chapter 11 or 13 and dissolved.

I personally recall a CNN anchor state that they had been doing a lot of maintenance work on the towers just a couple of days before 911. Was this maintenance work in fact a conspiratorial operation? Why were members of the the Bin Ladin family quietly escorted out of the country when commercial planes were still grounded? Also of note, is that Bin Ladin
are connected with the Bin Ladin Group, a Saudi multinational construction firm which oddly has a strange twist: "The registration for SBG's Internet domain name, saudi-binladin-group.com, was registered on September 11, 2000, for one year, expiring on the same day as the September 11, 2001 attacks." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Binladin_Group
Coincidence? or is there really something to it?

Before 911, there was what was called Operation Dark Winter - this was a mock terrorist attack exercise that convened just a few months prior to 911. Biological warfare was part of the details.
Coincidentally, following 911, there had been the delivery of mail tainted with anthrax to some political figures and a resolution to innoculate medical and military personnel in the days and weeks following 911.

In the late 90s, there was what was called the Project For A New American Century (PNAC)

Quote:
"New Pearl Harbor"
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" (51).[13]

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[37][38][39] investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman,[40] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[41] all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_fo ... _Harbor.22



The point I am making is that there ARE some real nutty theories out there, but then there some theories that make a lot of sense and those are the ones that threaten the OFFICIAL Story as presented in the 911 Commission Report.
Just because it's "OFFICIAL" doesn't always mean it is legitimate and without dark underpinnings.
I call the 911 Commission Report the "OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY".
And it is a stablemate to the Warren Commission's Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy

Will we ever know the truth? I seriously doubt it.
There will be people who will believe that Oswald acted alone and those who smell a dirty rat to their dying day.

What I think really drives those who are quick to condemn anyone who questions the government are simply afraid to ask, themselves. The truth is not always pretty, and the implications that the United States is NOT, in reality, what it has been portrayed as, boggles the feeble minds of those who believe in their government with such patriotism and loyalty, that they would lock themselves in chains in defense of it, even if it costs them their lives.

Btw, why do they call it the "UNITED" States when it's clear that the people are DIVIDED against themselves? To be united requires the forfeit of individuality and borders. Wouldn't that not be an oxymoron?


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:05 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:39 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: teh webz?
Twinhit wrote:
Floyd_The_Barber wrote:
Twinhit wrote:
Nevin1985 wrote:
Image



Official Conspiracy Theory

Image

They are all a bunch of nuts.

different view =/= nuts... also not all who believe conspiracy theories are tin foil hat wearing morons with "AN ALIUM EEEEEYYYAN THA SSSHHHYYYYEEED!!!!!!!!!"


It's funny when the Government says "We are here to help" and people cringe. But then those same people will believe the Official "THEORY" concerning 911 and take it for fact.
Buildings don't just come crashing down. A B-25 Mitchell hit the Empire State Building. It didn't bring that building down.
Maybe they built the building much better back then.

Another thing is Building 7. It didn't get hit by a plane, though it did suffer damage from one the tower's collapse. Yet it came down when the decision to "pull it" was made that afternoon. - per Silverstein
Most people forget that.

Also it takes a good deal of time to demo a building. How does Building 7 come down at near freefall speed like a demolition job and not be a demolition job.

Also of note, they didn't find WMDs in Iraq. Bush is quoted as saying that Bin Ladin is no longer relevant.
Benazar Bhutto said Bin Ladin was murdered. She then gets knocked off some two weeks later.

As for theories, my personal theory is that the buildings "may" have had strategically built-in devices that would go off in the event the building were to threaten to topple over onto adjacent buildings rather than collapse in on itself.
IF I am right, these devices would have been viewed as safety devices some 45+ years ago and had simply sat dormant all these years and the decision to "pull it" on the towers came when the threat against the adjacent buildings was percieved. Larry Silverstein was referring to building 7 when he made his remarks.

The towers were sometimes called "Nelson and David".
A company called ACE elevator company serviced the tower's elevators.
They filed Chapter 11 or 13 and dissolved.

I personally recall a CNN anchor state that they had been doing a lot of maintenance work on the towers just a couple of days before 911. Was this maintenance work in fact a conspiratorial operation? Why were members of the the Bin Ladin family quietly escorted out of the country when commercial planes were still grounded? Also of note, is that Bin Ladin
are connected with the Bin Ladin Group, a Saudi multinational construction firm which oddly has a strange twist: "The registration for SBG's Internet domain name, saudi-binladin-group.com, was registered on September 11, 2000, for one year, expiring on the same day as the September 11, 2001 attacks." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Binladin_Group
Coincidence? or is there really something to it?

Before 911, there was what was called Operation Dark Winter - this was a mock terrorist attack exercise that convened just a few months prior to 911. Biological warfare was part of the details.
Coincidentally, following 911, there had been the delivery of mail tainted with anthrax to some political figures and a resolution to innoculate medical and military personnel in the days and weeks following 911.

In the late 90s, there was what was called the Project For A New American Century (PNAC)

Quote:
"New Pearl Harbor"
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" (51).[13]

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[37][38][39] investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman,[40] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[41] all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_fo ... _Harbor.22



The point I am making is that there ARE some real nutty theories out there, but then there some theories that make a lot of sense and those are the ones that threaten the OFFICIAL Story as presented in the 911 Commission Report.
Just because it's "OFFICIAL" doesn't always mean it is legitimate and without dark underpinnings.
I call the 911 Commission Report the "OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY".
And it is a stablemate to the Warren Commission's Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy

Will we ever know the truth? I seriously doubt it.
There will be people who will believe that Oswald acted alone and those who smell a dirty rat to their dying day.

What I think really drives those who are quick to condemn anyone who questions the government are simply afraid to ask, themselves. The truth is not always pretty, and the implications that the United States is NOT, in reality, what it has been portrayed as, boggles the feeble minds of those who believe in their government with such patriotism and loyalty, that they would lock themselves in chains in defense of it, even if it costs them their lives.

Btw, why do they call it the "UNITED" States when it's clear that the people are DIVIDED against themselves? To be united requires the forfeit of individuality and borders. Wouldn't that not be an oxymoron?

the collapse of building 7 certainly LOOKS like a controlled demolition... watch it, it dips in the middle and then falls....

hell while were on conspiracy theories, i suppose ill bring this up to see where it goes: alien tech.... do we have it? i say no but we certainly ARE seeing things up in the sky and SOMETHING had to have crashed in roswell...

_________________
Favorite bands:

Melvins
The Jesus Lizard
Cows
Big Business
R***man
Minutemen
Flight
Minor Threat
Big Black
Shellac
Karp
Scratch Acid
Wipers
Pixies


Top
Profile
Post subject: Re: terror = a con ?
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:30 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:10 pm
Posts: 13467
Location: Palm Beach County FL
el Ingles wrote:
the world .
This is the sort of clumbsy thinking you would expect of western idiots .


Here's the point! A close friend of mine is in a field called "traffic". They arrange transportation of goods from point A to point B. Since 9/11 his involvement has become, shall we say, more security oriented, without going into details. He has been waiting for this one to happen for a long, long, time because those with the ability to do so have failed to step up to the plate. Do I need to refer you to "The Sum of All Fears" for further possibilities. :?: :?

_________________
"Another day in paradise!"


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:32 pm
Offline
Aspiring Musician
Aspiring Musician

Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:33 am
Posts: 650
Floyd_The_Barber wrote:
Twinhit wrote:
Floyd_The_Barber wrote:
Twinhit wrote:
Nevin1985 wrote:
Image



Official Conspiracy Theory

Image

They are all a bunch of nuts.

different view =/= nuts... also not all who believe conspiracy theories are tin foil hat wearing morons with "AN ALIUM EEEEEYYYAN THA SSSHHHYYYYEEED!!!!!!!!!"


It's funny when the Government says "We are here to help" and people cringe. But then those same people will believe the Official "THEORY" concerning 911 and take it for fact.
Buildings don't just come crashing down. A B-25 Mitchell hit the Empire State Building. It didn't bring that building down.
Maybe they built the building much better back then.

Another thing is Building 7. It didn't get hit by a plane, though it did suffer damage from one the tower's collapse. Yet it came down when the decision to "pull it" was made that afternoon. - per Silverstein
Most people forget that.

Also it takes a good deal of time to demo a building. How does Building 7 come down at near freefall speed like a demolition job and not be a demolition job.

Also of note, they didn't find WMDs in Iraq. Bush is quoted as saying that Bin Ladin is no longer relevant.
Benazar Bhutto said Bin Ladin was murdered. She then gets knocked off some two weeks later.

As for theories, my personal theory is that the buildings "may" have had strategically built-in devices that would go off in the event the building were to threaten to topple over onto adjacent buildings rather than collapse in on itself.
IF I am right, these devices would have been viewed as safety devices some 45+ years ago and had simply sat dormant all these years and the decision to "pull it" on the towers came when the threat against the adjacent buildings was percieved. Larry Silverstein was referring to building 7 when he made his remarks.

The towers were sometimes called "Nelson and David".
A company called ACE elevator company serviced the tower's elevators.
They filed Chapter 11 or 13 and dissolved.

I personally recall a CNN anchor state that they had been doing a lot of maintenance work on the towers just a couple of days before 911. Was this maintenance work in fact a conspiratorial operation? Why were members of the the Bin Ladin family quietly escorted out of the country when commercial planes were still grounded? Also of note, is that Bin Ladin
are connected with the Bin Ladin Group, a Saudi multinational construction firm which oddly has a strange twist: "The registration for SBG's Internet domain name, saudi-binladin-group.com, was registered on September 11, 2000, for one year, expiring on the same day as the September 11, 2001 attacks." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Binladin_Group
Coincidence? or is there really something to it?

Before 911, there was what was called Operation Dark Winter - this was a mock terrorist attack exercise that convened just a few months prior to 911. Biological warfare was part of the details.
Coincidentally, following 911, there had been the delivery of mail tainted with anthrax to some political figures and a resolution to innoculate medical and military personnel in the days and weeks following 911.

In the late 90s, there was what was called the Project For A New American Century (PNAC)

Quote:
"New Pearl Harbor"
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" (51).[13]

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[37][38][39] investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman,[40] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[41] all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_fo ... _Harbor.22



The point I am making is that there ARE some real nutty theories out there, but then there some theories that make a lot of sense and those are the ones that threaten the OFFICIAL Story as presented in the 911 Commission Report.
Just because it's "OFFICIAL" doesn't always mean it is legitimate and without dark underpinnings.
I call the 911 Commission Report the "OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY".
And it is a stablemate to the Warren Commission's Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy

Will we ever know the truth? I seriously doubt it.
There will be people who will believe that Oswald acted alone and those who smell a dirty rat to their dying day.

What I think really drives those who are quick to condemn anyone who questions the government are simply afraid to ask, themselves. The truth is not always pretty, and the implications that the United States is NOT, in reality, what it has been portrayed as, boggles the feeble minds of those who believe in their government with such patriotism and loyalty, that they would lock themselves in chains in defense of it, even if it costs them their lives.

Btw, why do they call it the "UNITED" States when it's clear that the people are DIVIDED against themselves? To be united requires the forfeit of individuality and borders. Wouldn't that not be an oxymoron?

the collapse of building 7 certainly LOOKS like a controlled demolition... watch it, it dips in the middle and then falls....

hell while were on conspiracy theories, i suppose ill bring this up to see where it goes: alien tech.... do we have it? i say no but we certainly ARE seeing things up in the sky and SOMETHING had to have crashed in roswell...


Not sure about the space alien stuff but Art Bell sure was interesting to listen to. My folks once had a neighbor back in the early 60s who claimed he went to venus on a spaceship, brought back things like a rock etc.
He'd be gone for a couple of weeks and come back and there was a peculiar circle in his field. Keep in mind this field was in the suburbs.
No one heard the space craft come and go. just that he was missing and turn up again.
Cousins said they had seen his eyes through his eyelids one day when he was sleeping on hammock out in the yard.
Weird stuff.
The man's name was Elmer Pugh.
Great stuff for sci-fi film imho.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:36 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:39 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: teh webz?
Twinhit wrote:
Floyd_The_Barber wrote:
Twinhit wrote:
Floyd_The_Barber wrote:
Twinhit wrote:
Nevin1985 wrote:
Image



Official Conspiracy Theory

Image

They are all a bunch of nuts.

different view =/= nuts... also not all who believe conspiracy theories are tin foil hat wearing morons with "AN ALIUM EEEEEYYYAN THA SSSHHHYYYYEEED!!!!!!!!!"


It's funny when the Government says "We are here to help" and people cringe. But then those same people will believe the Official "THEORY" concerning 911 and take it for fact.
Buildings don't just come crashing down. A B-25 Mitchell hit the Empire State Building. It didn't bring that building down.
Maybe they built the building much better back then.

Another thing is Building 7. It didn't get hit by a plane, though it did suffer damage from one the tower's collapse. Yet it came down when the decision to "pull it" was made that afternoon. - per Silverstein
Most people forget that.

Also it takes a good deal of time to demo a building. How does Building 7 come down at near freefall speed like a demolition job and not be a demolition job.

Also of note, they didn't find WMDs in Iraq. Bush is quoted as saying that Bin Ladin is no longer relevant.
Benazar Bhutto said Bin Ladin was murdered. She then gets knocked off some two weeks later.

As for theories, my personal theory is that the buildings "may" have had strategically built-in devices that would go off in the event the building were to threaten to topple over onto adjacent buildings rather than collapse in on itself.
IF I am right, these devices would have been viewed as safety devices some 45+ years ago and had simply sat dormant all these years and the decision to "pull it" on the towers came when the threat against the adjacent buildings was percieved. Larry Silverstein was referring to building 7 when he made his remarks.

The towers were sometimes called "Nelson and David".
A company called ACE elevator company serviced the tower's elevators.
They filed Chapter 11 or 13 and dissolved.

I personally recall a CNN anchor state that they had been doing a lot of maintenance work on the towers just a couple of days before 911. Was this maintenance work in fact a conspiratorial operation? Why were members of the the Bin Ladin family quietly escorted out of the country when commercial planes were still grounded? Also of note, is that Bin Ladin
are connected with the Bin Ladin Group, a Saudi multinational construction firm which oddly has a strange twist: "The registration for SBG's Internet domain name, saudi-binladin-group.com, was registered on September 11, 2000, for one year, expiring on the same day as the September 11, 2001 attacks." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Binladin_Group
Coincidence? or is there really something to it?

Before 911, there was what was called Operation Dark Winter - this was a mock terrorist attack exercise that convened just a few months prior to 911. Biological warfare was part of the details.
Coincidentally, following 911, there had been the delivery of mail tainted with anthrax to some political figures and a resolution to innoculate medical and military personnel in the days and weeks following 911.

In the late 90s, there was what was called the Project For A New American Century (PNAC)

Quote:
"New Pearl Harbor"
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" (51).[13]

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[37][38][39] investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman,[40] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[41] all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_fo ... _Harbor.22



The point I am making is that there ARE some real nutty theories out there, but then there some theories that make a lot of sense and those are the ones that threaten the OFFICIAL Story as presented in the 911 Commission Report.
Just because it's "OFFICIAL" doesn't always mean it is legitimate and without dark underpinnings.
I call the 911 Commission Report the "OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY".
And it is a stablemate to the Warren Commission's Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy

Will we ever know the truth? I seriously doubt it.
There will be people who will believe that Oswald acted alone and those who smell a dirty rat to their dying day.

What I think really drives those who are quick to condemn anyone who questions the government are simply afraid to ask, themselves. The truth is not always pretty, and the implications that the United States is NOT, in reality, what it has been portrayed as, boggles the feeble minds of those who believe in their government with such patriotism and loyalty, that they would lock themselves in chains in defense of it, even if it costs them their lives.

Btw, why do they call it the "UNITED" States when it's clear that the people are DIVIDED against themselves? To be united requires the forfeit of individuality and borders. Wouldn't that not be an oxymoron?

the collapse of building 7 certainly LOOKS like a controlled demolition... watch it, it dips in the middle and then falls....

hell while were on conspiracy theories, i suppose ill bring this up to see where it goes: alien tech.... do we have it? i say no but we certainly ARE seeing things up in the sky and SOMETHING had to have crashed in roswell...


Not sure about the space alien stuff but Art Bell sure was interesting to listen to. My folks once had a neighbor back in the early 60s who claimed he went to venus on a spaceship, brought back things like a rock etc.
He'd be gone for a couple of weeks and come back and there was a peculiar circle in his field. Keep in mind this field was in the suburbs.
No one heard the space craft come and go. just that he was missing and turn up again.
Cousins said they had seen his eyes through his eyelids one day when he was sleeping on hammock out in the yard.
Weird stuff.
The man's name was Elmer Pugh.
Great stuff for sci-fi film imho.

abduction stories are always interesting, though i dont think anyone went to or lived on venus.... not saying he was lying, but no way in hell the planet he saw was venus... hed be a pancke :lol:

_________________
Favorite bands:

Melvins
The Jesus Lizard
Cows
Big Business
R***man
Minutemen
Flight
Minor Threat
Big Black
Shellac
Karp
Scratch Acid
Wipers
Pixies


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:53 pm
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:20 pm
Posts: 9640
Location: Indiana
Floyd_The_Barber wrote:
...abduction stories are always interesting, though i dont think anyone went to or lived on venus.... not saying he was lying, but no way in hell the planet he saw was venus... hed be a pancke :lol:


:lol: So you can believe some "alien' ship was able to silently "abduct" the guy, and travel to other planets having to be light years away, but you can't believe that they could overcome the gravitational pull of Venus???? :lol:

_________________
---> "The amp should be SWITCHED OFF AND UNPLUGGED before you do this!" <---

Por favor, disculpe mi español, no se llega a la práctica con mucha frecuencia.


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:57 pm
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:39 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: teh webz?
shimmilou wrote:
Floyd_The_Barber wrote:
...abduction stories are always interesting, though i dont think anyone went to or lived on venus.... not saying he was lying, but no way in hell the planet he saw was venus... hed be a pancke :lol:


:lol: So you can believe some "alien' ship was able to silently "abduct" the guy, and travel to other planets having to be light years away, but you can't believe that they could overcome the gravitational pull of Venus???? :lol:

"not saying he was lying" = sarcasm.... txt r n0 g00d 4 tht

_________________
Favorite bands:

Melvins
The Jesus Lizard
Cows
Big Business
R***man
Minutemen
Flight
Minor Threat
Big Black
Shellac
Karp
Scratch Acid
Wipers
Pixies


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: