It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2020 4:19 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:47 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:38 am
Posts: 4333
Location: Tennessee
I agree that you brought it on yourself,he gave you an answer that was bare bones,no frill,and you replied in a smart a** way,and you got a smart a** reply.
I would imagine you don't like some of the remarks here also.


Top
Profile
Fender Play Winter Sale 2020
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:24 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
Ceri wrote:
nikininja wrote:
Forget Callaham and go for Wilkinson. Better quality, cheaper, compensated saddles are better

This one, for example:

http://www.stewmac.com/shop/Bridges,_ta ... es#details

I do believe that one can't be toploaded, though those saddles are available seperately (same page) and can be added to a toploading bridge.

Bound to say though, I do agree with Mr Callaham's reasons for not toploading a Telecaster.

BTW:

Hi Nikininja! :D

Cheers - C


F.Hop wrote:
Hiya mate


Well Hello to you two, too.

Here's the top/base loader from Wilkinson, for the princely sum of £24.

Image

I know it's not the best photo in the world, but if you look carefully you can just see the toploader holes.
Better views to be had here.
http://www.ivormairants.co.uk/wilkinson-wtbcr-tele-bridge-chrome.html?utm_source=base&utm_medium=googlebase&utm_content=WTBCR&utm_campaign=gbase_uk

Funny aint it. Lets have a look at Bill's statement. "I couldn't in good concience sell a top loading bridge".

That reduced break angle over the saddles has never done Gibson, or any of the other Tune'o'matic bridge using manufacturers any harm. Infact a lot of players load into the stoptail section backwards, and then come over the top of the stop tail to the saddle. To further reduce the break angle.


Is this guy going to start making up stories about them too.

So yeah, I'd say Ryan is right. One thing though mate. Soon as he come his nonsense, he wouldn't have gotten another reply from me. That was your mistake. The guys caught up in his own hype.

A lot of people mistakenly screw the stoptail section of their guitars right down to the top of the body, then wonder why they plough through saddles and break strings all the time.
It's the one advantage of the tune'o'matic bridge design that you can lessen the break angle.
Let's face a fact here, much as I hate to admit it. Gibson have always had a better understanding of exactly whats needed when it comes to these mysterious break angles, than Fender. Hence the complete lack of Gibson string tree's at the other end of the string.

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:44 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:57 am
Posts: 13164
Location: Peckham: where the snow leopards roam
nikininja wrote:
That reduced break angle over the saddles has never done Gibson, or any of the other Tune'o'matic bridge using manufacturers any harm. Infact a lot of players load into the stoptail section backwards, and then come over the top of the stop tail to the saddle. To further reduce the break angle.

Ha. Not only is that perfectly reasonable - it's also how I string a Les Paul myself. So I can hardly object! :lol:

Now then. What about better transmission of sound by having the strings pass through the body on the Telecaster? Shoot that one down for us as well, if you'd be so kind, Ninja! :D

Gosh, we have to get back on our toes round here now, don't we? 8)

Cheers - C


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:03 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
Easy.

I don't believe that having the string passing through the body does anything for the sound of the guitar, one way or the other.

Doesn't it increase sustain?
Well I don't believe so. The guitars that are noted for huge, long sustain dont have strings through the body either.

Those guitars have glued in necks....

So glue your neck in and see how much difference it makes. The Jackson Stealth/Soloist has neck through and doesn't get much, if any benefit in sustain over a Dinky which has a bolt on neck.

Doesn't the down pressure increase the tonal response of the guitar?

No when the saddles are pressed down their pressed down. Whether thats 110lb "2 or 2lb"2 it's pressed down. Do you really think that a soundwave so distorted from passing through layers of materials with different densities. Heavy density ones squashing the soundwave, lighter densities allowing it to expand, is going to do anything for your guitars sound?
Ask yourself whether a vibrating soundwave or body resonance would have a easier or harder time passing between two objects that were pressed together so tightly you cant move em, or not so tightly, that the object could still move with the vibration?

Don't fall for the hype. The sound comes from the pickups, tronics and to a lesser degree the saddles and nut. The things that are on the talk length of the string. Body/neck woods may play a part in that. I'd love for someone to explain to me exactly how much of a part they do play and how you measure it accurately.

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:07 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 9034
Location: Louisiana
yep! :wink:


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:11 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star

Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 6911
i have two different tele's that have the same pickups and hardware.
they are basicly the same guitars with different bridges. one laces strings through the body whiletheother laces via the bridge.
theres a noticable difference in sustain between the two.

does sound travel faster through water or air?
Sound does not travel at the same speed in air as it does in water. In dry air at 20o C it travels about 343 meters/second. In water it travels 4.3 times as fast.
this fact leads me to believe that the more solid the subject that sound is to travel through the better. so a glued on neck is way better for sustain than a bolt on.

_________________
63supro
"The good thing is in a club situation, most of the patrons are trashed and really can't tell the difference."


Last edited by way cool jr on Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:20 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 9034
Location: Louisiana
For whales and dolphins--water! :)


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:22 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star

Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 6911
sound is sound. doesnt matter who or where the sound is coming from.

_________________
63supro
"The good thing is in a club situation, most of the patrons are trashed and really can't tell the difference."


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:23 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 9034
Location: Louisiana
way cool jr wrote:
sound is sound. doesnt matter who or where the sound is coming from.


Yeah, sound is sound alright. :wink:


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:26 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star

Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 6911
explain

_________________
63supro
"The good thing is in a club situation, most of the patrons are trashed and really can't tell the difference."


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:28 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 9034
Location: Louisiana
explain what? I was agreeing with you! :)


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:51 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:47 am
Posts: 15336
Location: In a galaxy far far away
But sound doesnt travel through the neck. The pickups pickup the vibration of the string and send it through to the amplifier.

It's not like a acoustic guitar where the body/neck wood, construction and shape become the amplifier.

Do you really think that the way a body resonates affects the magnetic field of the pickup or the vibration of the string to any appreciable degree?

_________________
No no and no


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:06 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Posts: 7714
Location: Planet Earth
CAFeathers wrote:
Looks to me like he was very nice about it. He gave you a good reason for it not be a good idea and then told you he would not do it.
I agree with you Chet, I think it went wrong when Ryan said
Quote
Wow, ok thank you for convincing me to not do business with you again. I guess I should get rid of my other top loading guitars as well. I will take my money to someone else. Thanks.
End Quote
Until then I think Bill was being nice about it. And to answer himself says something also.

_________________
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

Thomas Jefferson


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:08 am
Offline
Rock Star
Rock Star

Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 6911
if it were not effective so many guitar builders wouldnt do it.
it costs more to glue a neck than to screw one on.
theres no substitute for a sold piece of wood.
do i think that the wood effects the magnetic field of the pickup? not so much. do i believe that the wood effects how long that pickup is allowed to ring, hell yes it does. there are other factors that effect the duration as well.
pickup, bridge choice, string choice, nut choice, all these things play a major role in how long/short a note will ring on that solid piece of wood.

_________________
63supro
"The good thing is in a club situation, most of the patrons are trashed and really can't tell the difference."


Top
Profile
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:21 am
Offline
Rock Icon
Rock Icon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:57 am
Posts: 13164
Location: Peckham: where the snow leopards roam
fhopkins wrote:
yep! :wink:

Hey Hop: the Ninja and CV both on one thread. Feels like this website is getting back to normal - good, huh? :D :D :D

Cheers - C


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Fender Play Winter Sale 2020

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: